#1
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:07 AM
7. The Panthers have apparently elected to go with slow and steady over athletic ability at free safety.
Former Ravens backup Haruki Nakamura (who was stuck behind some guy named Ed Reed) got the start and took all the work with the first offense.
Former second-round pick Sherrod Martin, who unlike Nakamura has range, is now a bench warmer.
This was initially a competition, but it appears the Panthers have made their decision. Martin’s such a better athlete it’s comical, but he had a series of gaffes in coverage last year that even had the owner cracking on him.
Basically, they’re electing to go with a limitation they can plan on rather than guessing where the more talented Martin will be.
Are we really benching the more talented player?
#2
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:09 AM
#3
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:17 AM
#4
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:19 AM
I think it's funny that they pretend to know anything about this team.
#5
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:21 AM
#6
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:21 AM
and a vocal communicator.
there's a reason he's the starter.
#7
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:23 AM
Darin Gantt wrote the article.
*processing*
nope, means nothing to me...
#8
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:25 AM
*processing*
nope, means nothing to me...
Me neither, but the sad thing is, he's probably the best beat writer we have, and he doesn't even cover the team anymore.
#9
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:31 AM
he's looked pretty good in coverage so far. nothing blown, always there for the stop, good against the run, good in deep zones.
and a vocal communicator.
there's a reason he's the starter.
Exactly. They're called "safeties" for a reason. Protect the field deep first and foremost and you'll probably never lose your job.
#10
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:34 AM
#11
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:35 AM
#12
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:39 AM
#13
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:40 AM
Darin Gantt wrote the article.
DGantt is the man.
#14
Posted 27 August 2012 - 02:41 AM
#15
Posted 27 August 2012 - 02:41 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





