Could the Bills depth at DT work to our advantage?
#1
Posted 27 August 2012 - 10:54 AM
#2
Posted 27 August 2012 - 10:57 AM
#3
Posted 27 August 2012 - 11:06 AM
I will pass on both.
#4
Posted 27 August 2012 - 11:46 AM
#5
Posted 27 August 2012 - 11:47 AM
At this point, I'm not worried about DT's, I'm more worried about DE's. Weird, I know.
After last night, backfield concerns me more
Atleast we are holding them to FG's
#6
Posted 27 August 2012 - 11:50 AM
#7
Posted 27 August 2012 - 11:52 AM
#8
Posted 27 August 2012 - 11:58 AM
Very weird considering the huge pocket each opposing QB has to step up into.At this point, I'm not worried about DT's, I'm more worried about DE's. Weird, I know.
#9
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:00 PM
#10
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:16 PM
After last night, backfield concerns me more
Atleast we are holding them to FG's
How lol? Sanchez had 20 minutes each play to get the ball downfield. Hence the d-line concern.
#11
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:21 PM
#12
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:22 PM
#13
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:27 PM
Sanchez had a clean pocket to step into all night. We made an offensive line that had been marked with problems for the past week look like the Patriots. We need to do something because I just can't deal with another season of this.
Look like the Patriots!?!?! I must have missed the offensive Juggernaut, that was the Jets. And FWIW the only problem the Jets were having with their O-line was RT.
#14
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:28 PM
How lol? Sanchez had 20 minutes each play to get the ball downfield. Hence the d-line concern.
As I said in one post, there was multiple missed holding calls but they just let them play
Sanchez had to scramble and move a few times. It was as bad it may seemed at all. On the other hand, watching Capt and Gamble let a rookie burned them was... ahh...
#15
Posted 27 August 2012 - 12:31 PM
Very weird considering the huge pocket each opposing QB has to step up into.
True but the LB's picked up the slack. The 1st team DT's outperformed the 1st team DE's.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





