Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Official Cut Thread


  • Please log in to reply
641 replies to this topic

#81 4Corners

4Corners

    2014 Huddle Poster of the Year.

  • Joined: 07-January 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,893
  • Reputation: 1,632
  • Location704
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 12:38 PM

Seriously though, a Superbowl MVP is an upgrade over Murphy, Pilares or maybe even LaFell. Pats are either tripping or stacked, probably stacked.


Yeah, because a SB MVP of 6 years ago looked really good when he played with Seattle.

#82 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 17,068
  • Reputation: 5,240
Moderators

Posted 31 August 2012 - 12:38 PM

But, but, he looked so happy here.

Posted Image

Seriously though, a Superbowl MVP is an upgrade over Murphy, Pilares or maybe even LaFell. Pats are either tripping or stacked, probably stacked.

Go look up how well veterans they have released in the past fared with their next teams.. The only one I can recall that had some sort of success afterwards was Vrabel.

#83 Panthers4lyfe

Panthers4lyfe

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 20-September 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 428
  • Reputation: 44
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 12:38 PM

Pats have shown consistency in cutting guys at the right time. Not interested in the least.

while that may be true, i'd like a branch/gaffney in case something were to happen to smitty(fingers crossed).. we wouls have no Vet's. If something happened at least we would handicap ourselves with Lafell, Murphy, Branch, Pilares.. i like our odds a lot better when you put a VET in there like that

#84 HeatCheck

HeatCheck

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,773
  • Reputation: 81
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 12:39 PM

There is no reason to go after a 33 year old receiver.

#85 mj4life

mj4life

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-March 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 944
  • Reputation: 28
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 12:39 PM

But, but, he looked so happy here.
maybe 5 years ago.
Posted Image

Seriously though, a Superbowl MVP is an upgrade over Murphy, Pilares or maybe even LaFell. Pats are either tripping or stacked, probably stacked.



#86 4Corners

4Corners

    2014 Huddle Poster of the Year.

  • Joined: 07-January 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,893
  • Reputation: 1,632
  • Location704
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 12:40 PM

There is no reason to go after a 33 year old receiver.


I agree w/ this, but if I had to pick I would take Plax over Branch 10/10 times.

#87 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 17,068
  • Reputation: 5,240
Moderators

Posted 31 August 2012 - 12:41 PM

There were better vet receivers released before all is said and done. Branch looked like hot garbage last year and the Pats know when to let go of "old guys."

#88 SIGCHI222

SIGCHI222

    the illustrious potentate

  • Joined: 15-February 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,128
  • Reputation: 4,012
  • LocationShelby
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 12:42 PM

But, but, he looked so happy here.

Posted Image

Seriously though, a Superbowl MVP is an upgrade over Murphy, Pilares or maybe even LaFell. Pats are either tripping or stacked, probably stacked.


Are we 100%, dead-on certain that Brady doesn't bat on both sides of the plate?

#89 Guest_Hokebuck_*

Guest_Hokebuck_*
Guests

Posted 31 August 2012 - 12:42 PM

Amranti Edwards in 5...4...3...2...



See you guys in Tampa! :)

#90 Brooklyn Bully

Brooklyn Bully

    Sell it, Jerry

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,894
  • Reputation: 1,526
HUDDLER

Posted 31 August 2012 - 12:44 PM

God oh mighty our Beat writers are all trash. They're just now tweeting cuts that have been common knowledge for hrs now.

Charlotte Observer: if any of you are reading this thread fire them, and hire ANY 2 Huddlers to fill their positions! I guarantee that they will be better than what u currently have.


What's funny, is that some of you think the only job of a beat reporter is to tweet. That's probably last on their daily list of things to do. You think they sit on front of a computer for the latest news, or wait for a text from a source, just to tweet it out right away? Good lord.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users