Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Terrell McClain waived by Panthers


  • Please log in to reply
468 replies to this topic

#311 Guest_Bwood_*

Guest_Bwood_*
Guests

Posted 02 September 2012 - 11:18 PM

Fua/R.Edwards are run stuffing NT's.

McClain/D.Edwards/Neblett are pass rushing UT's.

#312 SIGCHI222

SIGCHI222

    the illustrious potentate

  • Joined: 15-February 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,128
  • Reputation: 4,012
  • LocationShelby
HUDDLER

Posted 02 September 2012 - 11:26 PM

I knew they played different positions. Ones a Under Tackle (UT) the other a Nose Tackle (NT). What I didn't know was that once the amount is set for that position you can't cut and add more for that position. I.E. cut a QB and add a UT. (thanks MadHatter)

Fua played NT at Stanford and McClain was a UT for South Florida. Dwan is a UT, much better than McClain, so he replaced him.

I still think Fua was the worse of the two, regardless of position. Imo, McClain was better last year (although he played like crap) than Fua. This year Fua showed more in the Preseason than McClain.

The only thing I'm concerned with this move is Dwans Age. We got rid of a Younger guy who played for only one year and added a Veteran who's better but won't play for as long as the younger guy. It goes against the going young philosophy and build through the draft rhetoric that was pounded away on us when a certain vet would come available at a given position of need.


Edwards at UT or McClain at UT?
Fua cannot play the 1 tech, that is obvious, but he may develop at he 3. McClain was relegated to the 1, he failed and failed against 3rd teamers when we played Pittsburgh.
I very well may be wrong but Dwan will post more numbers than McClain could have dreamed of at the 3 tech.
If McClain succeeds, it will be at the 3 tech, he doesn't have the motor to be an NFL NT.
No offense, but that is what I believe bra.

#313 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,045
  • Reputation: 2,742
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 12:02 AM

Edwards at UT or McClain at UT?
Fua cannot play the 1 tech, that is obvious, but he may develop at he 3. McClain was relegated to the 1, he failed and failed against 3rd teamers when we played Pittsburgh.
I very well may be wrong but Dwan will post more numbers than McClain could have dreamed of at the 3 tech.
If McClain succeeds, it will be at the 3 tech, he doesn't have the motor to be an NFL NT.
No offense, but that is what I believe bra.


To answer your question. Um, At this point in time. Dwan at UT is the right choice. D. Edwards has proved to be somewhat successful at that position. His numbers are very decent. Again, only concern with me about him is age. That's all.

It's just that is we are going to swallow some pills that are, hard to swallow. Like letting go of a 3rd round pick. Might as well do it for everyone. Mainly another Edwards that's not named Ron or Dwan. Also a guy who wears #7.

No offense taken at all. You weren't being offensive at all or had an undermining tone.

#314 The Special One

The Special One

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 15-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,228
  • Reputation: 120
HUDDLER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 01:16 AM

Finally got around to watching the final preseason game vs Steelers. I noticed McClain playing most of the 4th quarter. I also noticed McClain struggling badly to get off his blocker. The guy could not get any push and just plain looked bad.

Forget that McClain was a 3rd rounder and realize that getting Dwan Edwards was a pretty major upgrade.

#315 rico6

rico6

    Shit.

  • Joined: 03-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,760
  • Reputation: 224
HUDDLER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 02:05 AM

I'm certain Sione Fua is on some relation to Rivera now.

#316 KSpan

KSpan

    Bow-chicka-wow-wow!

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 3,481
  • Reputation: 1,771
  • LocationKansas City
SUPPORTER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 07:16 AM

Did anyone else notice during the Jets and Pittsburg games that Fua played alongside Edwards with excellent results? There was one series in particular near the red zone where Fua was in on 2 of the 3 stops from the UT position. More than meets the eye to this cut.

#317 MHS831

MHS831

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 08-June 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,812
  • Reputation: 2,646
HUDDLER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 07:25 AM

I thiink that it is going to come out later that the issue was more about his attitude, work ethic, some off the field issue, etc. than his play. When have we ever abandoned a high pick this fast?

#318 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 20,088
  • Reputation: 14,958
MFCEO

Posted 03 September 2012 - 07:26 AM

I bet he signs with Tampa today. He went to USF and is well liked in the area. They are thin at DT.

#319 Toundra

Toundra

    100% French meat

  • Joined: 18-March 11
  • posts: 2,153
  • Reputation: 633
SUPPORTER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 08:03 AM

Sigh.. now i am angry.

#320 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,885
  • Reputation: 3,405
  • LocationShallotte, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 08:11 AM

I don't care if they played the same position. Fua wasn't good at his position. Krease and Shirley were better NT's. Now Shirley gone and Fua still here.

McClain was a 3 tech and we really only had Nebblett (who is gone for the 1st 4 games) and him. Now we can move some of the DE to 3 tech on passing downs. But We really only had 2 3 techs on the roster. We have 3 NT's on the roster. I would have loved if those 3 were Shirley, Edwards, and Krease. If we can cut McClain like that. Then we could have cut Fua and kept Shirley.


Kearse is a 3-tech, not a NT. While he has played NT some for us, that's not his actual or natural position.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users