Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Terrell McClain waived by Panthers


  • Please log in to reply
468 replies to this topic

#401 Gabeking

Gabeking

    Member

  • Joined: 27-February 10
  • posts: 3,509
  • Reputation: 1,644
SUPPORTER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 05:45 PM

This wasnt the issue.

Off the field issues played a role in this.


Of course it did cuz you know everything that happens behind the scenes right? It has NOTHING to do cuz he just plain out sucked..

#402 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 05:49 PM

I had no idea Terrell McClain was this important.


People keep missing the point.

You cut a 3rd round pick after 1 year and the reason is "not showing consistency". This is a problem.

When you have a history of and still have people on the roster now who haven't shown consistency for years.

We just want to know what else happen.

#403 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 17,085
  • Reputation: 5,244
Moderators

Posted 03 September 2012 - 05:52 PM

I get the point, but it's done with. I would've preferred several other guys gone before McClain to make room for Edwards. I understand venting and reasoning it out with fellow fans, but only for a period of time... It's over with. As fans, we pull for the team with the hand that was dealt, lol.

#404 BountyHunter

BountyHunter

    I'm not a Saint

  • Joined: 07-January 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 623
  • Reputation: 117
HUDDLER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 05:55 PM

Still it doesn't change the underline problem that we used a 3rd round pick on a guy and cut him a year later. Somebody F'd up here.


You know who F'd up? Terrell McClain F'd up. He had the opportunity and the potential to be a part of this team going forward. It's obvious that the coaches didn't feel he took advantage of either or those things.

From the sound of it, he wasn't giving the effort needed to improve. On this team lack of effort will get you fired no matter where you were drafted. But, if you show effort and improvement you will be given a chance to stay around.

That's why AE is still here. He continues to impress coaches with his work ethic and effort.

#405 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 05:59 PM

I get the point, but it's done with. I would've preferred several other guys gone before McClain to make room for Edwards. I understand venting and reasoning it out with fellow fans, but only for a period of time... It's over with. As fans, we pull for the team with the hand that was dealt, lol.



It just happen a day ago? So we can know for the future situation when does the statute of limitations run out on a topic?


And can I bring this up on other people who bring up old topics?

#406 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 17,085
  • Reputation: 5,244
Moderators

Posted 03 September 2012 - 06:01 PM

I'm just giving you my opinion. You can do whatever you want, I just don't think it's worth this much energy/time...

We didn't just cut John Randle.

#407 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 06:02 PM

You know who F'd up? Terrell McClain F'd up. He had the opportunity and the potential to be a part of this team going forward. It's obvious that the coaches didn't feel he took advantage of either or those things.

From the sound of it, he wasn't giving the effort needed to improve. On this team lack of effort will get you fired no matter where you were drafted. But, if you show effort and improvement you will be given a chance to stay around.

That's why AE is still here. He continues to impress coaches with his work ethic and effort.



Beyond the McClain thing. When will AE impress enough to get on the field. He was so impressive we drafted somebody to do his job.

#408 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 06:05 PM

I'm just giving you my opinion. You can do whatever you want, I just don't think it's worth this much energy/time...

We didn't just cut John Randle.



How do you know?? He only played 1 year in a position that takes 2 or 3 years to reach your potential. Jovan Haye did pretty good.

#409 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 06:07 PM

It just happen a day ago? So we can know for the future situation when does the statute of limitations run out on a topic?


And can I bring this up on other people who bring up old topics?



I do need a answer for this. So I'll know next time.

#410 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,922
  • Reputation: 5,445
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon
HUDDLER

Posted 03 September 2012 - 06:09 PM

So again lets cut the DT who had only been here for a years and keep the WR that has done nothing in 3 years.

Still it doesn't change the underline problem that we used a 3rd round pick on a guy and cut him a year later. Somebody F'd up here.


Completely unrelated transactions. You don't cut a WR to add another DT. You cut the lowest rated DT to add a better DT.

The staff had already determined how deep they want to be at each position. Why is that hard to understand?

Now, you can make an argument that we should have signed a different WR and let Armanti go. And, there is support for that,

However, keeping Armanti and making thistle have Nothing to do with each other.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users