All Saints* players' suspensions have been overturned
#106
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:00 PM
#107
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:00 PM
#108
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:23 PM
Ok here is the deal. I have thought about it and I am actually going to let you guys off the hook. All you have to do is say you are sorry, admit that you were wrong, admit that this * stuff was just your way of dealing with the fact that your team has never won a super bowl, admit that you secretly wanted the Saints** players to be suspended because you can't compete when they are at full strength, admit that what the Saints** were doing is nothing worst than any other team in the league, admit that the Saints** actually had less players injured playing against them than the majority of teams in the league, admit that Godell lied about evidence, lied about Hargrove, lied about saying he had 50,000 pages of documents that backed up his story, admit that the Saints** as much as you hate it have the greatest fan base, the greatest owner and the best QB in the NFL and maybe just maybe I will let you participate in a dialogue with me. Until then you really should just remain quiet because you have no credibility or character.
If your litany is what you want us to apologize about, there is no reason to do so, Nothing in the ruling today has anything to do with your rantings. Goodell wasn't wrong about Bountygate or about the evidence or anything else he said or did against the coaches or the team. None of those penalties or sanctions were revoked. The panel simply interpreted the "direct evidence of harm to other players" more stringent that Goodell did. So his crime was taking a more loose interpretation in order to err on the side of protecting players versus the panel. He is guilty of that. As for the rest, everything still stands. What happened surely did occur. They just felt that for example that Vilma giving money for bounties wasn't actually doing the damage himself so you couldn't suspend him. That hardly vindicates him or makes him less of a scumbag. That was just narrowing the interpretation of the comissioner's power.
#109
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:27 PM
"Victory is mi...wait, wut?"
#110
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:27 PM
Ok here is the deal. I have thought about it and I am actually going to let you guys off the hook. All you have to do is say you are sorry, admit that you were wrong, admit that this * stuff was just your way of dealing with the fact that your team has never won a super bowl, admit that you secretly wanted the Saints** players to be suspended because you can't compete when they are at full strength, admit that what the Saints** were doing is nothing worst than any other team in the league, admit that the Saints** actually had less players injured playing against them than the majority of teams in the league, admit that Godell lied about evidence, lied about Hargrove, lied about saying he had 50,000 pages of documents that backed up his story, admit that the Saints** as much as you hate it have the greatest fan base, the greatest owner and the best QB in the NFL and maybe just maybe I will let you participate in a dialogue with me. Until then you really should just remain quiet because you have no credibility or character.
haha look at this guy
#111
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:28 PM
i don't expect that saint troll to notice that or any of these other curious panther fans in the Saints* corners..but you are right.I don't think that the appeal court said anything about whether Bountygate happened so much as they decided that Goodell didn't have the power to impose penalties unless there was clear danger to other players. In this case they didn't think that there was definite proof that the player's roles in the bounty system met their interpretation of the standard of hurting and injuring other players by those players who were penalized. And he couldn't impose future penalties unless they could prove there was a clear and evident danger to other players from a player's actions.
That is a far cry from saying that the Saints*** were vindicated or that Goodell was wrong. They just ruled that they were imposing a high standard of proof and narrowly defining Goodell's power in this case. If no bounty gate existed then they would have overturned the coaching sanctions and team penalties as well. They didn't justify any of the Saints*** actions just applied a tougher injury interpretation to Goodell's power to impose penalties on players.
yep. shallow and temporary victory.http://profootballta...l-be-re-issued/
Potentially good news.
It’s likely that the league will simply re-issue the same suspensions. Indeed, the memo sent by NFL general counsel Jeff Pash to the various teams on Friday clearly indicates that the league continues to believe that wrongdoing occurred — and that there should be significant punishment for it.
“Nothing in today’s decision contradicts any of the facts found in the investigation into this matter, or absolves any player of responsibility for conduct detrimental,” Pash writes. “Nor does the decision in any way suggest what discipline would be appropriate for conduct that lies within the authority of the Commissioner. Per the panel’s direction, the Commissioner will promptly reconsider the matter and make a determination of the appropriate discipline consistent with the standards set forth in today’s decision. All clubs will be advised when that decision is made.”
It would be a surprise if the outcome is anything other than what it already was: a full season for Vilma, four games for Smith, three games for Fujita, and eight games for Hargrove.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/07/leagues-internal-memo-suggests-that-suspensions-will-be-re-issued/
#112
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:30 PM
i wonder how many actually read what that clown says. i suspect mostly people point and laugh.haha look at this guy
#113
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:32 PM
Ok here is the deal. I have thought about it and I am actually going to let you guys off the hook. All you have to do is say you are sorry, admit that you were wrong, admit that this * stuff was just your way of dealing with the fact that your team has never won a super bowl, admit that you secretly wanted the Saints** players to be suspended because you can't compete when they are at full strength, admit that what the Saints** were doing is nothing worst than any other team in the league, admit that the Saints** actually had less players injured playing against them than the majority of teams in the league, admit that Godell lied about evidence, lied about Hargrove, lied about saying he had 50,000 pages of documents that backed up his story, admit that the Saints** as much as you hate it have the greatest fan base, the greatest owner and the best QB in the NFL and maybe just maybe I will let you participate in a dialogue with me. Until then you really should just remain quiet because you have no credibility or character.
Worst troll award, total garbage.
#114
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:34 PM
once the wording gets changed, vilma will be right back to moping right along with the rest of the Saints** players and the dwindling number of bandwagoners that will probably jump on some other less douchey team's bandwagon.If your litany is what you want us to apologize about, there is no reason to do so, Nothing in the ruling today has anything to do with your rantings. Goodell wasn't wrong about Bountygate or about the evidence or anything else he said or did against the coaches or the team. None of those penalties or sanctions were revoked. The panel simply interpreted the "direct evidence of harm to other players" more stringent that Goodell did. So his crime was taking a more loose interpretation in order to err on the side of protecting players versus the panel. He is guilty of that. As for the rest, everything still stands. What happened surely did occur. They just felt that for example that Vilma giving money for bounties wasn't actually doing the damage himself so you couldn't suspend him. That hardly vindicates him or makes him less of a scumbag. That was just narrowing the interpretation of the comissioner's power.
meanwhile the rest of the country will continue to point and laugh and notice the big asterisk sign beside that Saints* lombardi trophy while those hard core Saints* fans go back to wearing bags on their heads.
#115
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:46 PM
#116
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:51 PM
#117
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:52 PM
#118
Posted 07 September 2012 - 09:55 PM
#119
Posted 07 September 2012 - 10:02 PM
#120
Guest_Bwood_*
Posted 07 September 2012 - 10:04 PM
I'M NOT FINISHED! Before I let you leave this discussion not only must you apologize in this forum but you must also walk to the front of BOA Stadium put your head between your legs and yell "whodat I was wrong!"



Coming from an Univ. of Miami fan, I couldn't care less about Vilma's return. I know the kind of player he is and he doesn't scare me at all. We got the better linebacker from the Canes.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





