Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Female Judge Victim Blaming Sexual Assault Victim.

49 posts in this topic

Posted

Again, you can't make up a scenario and call it typical until you can demonstrate something like it has actually happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Again, you can't make up a scenario and call it typical until you can demonstrate something like it has actually happened.

...and you can take one word out of my post and harp on it, but it doesn't change the fact that you only argue against people who don't hold your personal ideology up instead of being objective about things.

Had one of the more conservative posters in this forum said "I hope she has a daughter" in that manner in which anybodyhome did, you and Cantrell would have been all over them about how "regressive" they are, calling them names and generally attacking them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Had one of the more conservative posters in this forum said "I hope she has a daughter," you would have pulled out your dick and ran into the street making arm-pit farts and whistling Dixie.

Typical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Had one of the more conservative posters in this forum said "I hope she has a daughter," you would have pulled out your dick and ran into the street making arm-pit farts and whistling Dixie.

Typical.

Only difference is that I've actually seen you jump all over the more conservative posters for much less... and although I'm sure you would thoroughly enjoy it if I pulled out my dick and ran into the street, that hasn't happened... not yet anyway.

I'll be sure to let you know if I do though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I hope you have a gay son, biscuit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If anyone else on here you two typically argue with had made the comment "I hope she has a daughter" you would have been all over it like white on rice with your "progressive" righteousness... but because it's a conservative judge being a dumbass, that apparently makes it fair game to wish harm...

Typical.

You can't make up something that we've done and then say "typical" as if we actually did it.

It's typical that you would not take offense at what he said, but you would have if it had been say.. G5.

What, you mean you couldn't understand what I actually meant?

Again, you can't make up a scenario and call it typical until you can demonstrate something like it has actually happened.

hahaha this owns

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I never understood judges' love affairs with piggies.

aren't you former military? if anyone should understand preferential treatment, it's you

also this case appears to have more to do with the judge's horrible regressive views (appointed by jan brewer) than whether or not the assailant was a police officer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

aren't you former military? if anyone should understand preferential treatment, it's you

please explain

also this case appears to have more to do with the judge's horrible regressive views (appointed by jan brewer) than whether or not the assailant was a police officer.

I would agree if the police officer received a sentence that was somewhat rational. However, given her words, plus the extra-light, fat free punishment to the officer, I think its both. I'm not going to go look at every case she's tried, but I doubt a roofing contractor would receive such a gentle pat on the wrists under the same circumstances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

well

a ) in reference to sexual assault, it is a huge fuging problem in the military but for some reason that can't seem to be dealt with at all

b ) just happened to read an article recently that mentioned that no one has been executed under the ucmj since 1961

c ) you literally get points tacked on to your scores in testing for public sector jobs simply for enlisting to fight an unnecessary war

these are three widely different examples of preferential treatment given simply for being a part of team america: world police. i just think it's funny that you've never understood preferential treatment for police officers when military members get away with equal and worse poo than this

also the officer in this case was pretty clearly given an irrational sentence simply because the judge felt the victim was to blame. i mean she was pretty direct about it all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

well

a ) in reference to sexual assault, it is a huge fuging problem in the military but for some reason that can't seem to be dealt with at all

b ) just happened to read an article recently that mentioned that no one has been executed under the ucmj since 1961

c ) you literally get points tacked on to your scores in testing for public sector jobs simply for enlisting to fight an unnecessary war

these are three widely different examples of preferential treatment given simply for being a part of team america: world police. i just think it's funny that you've never understood preferential treatment for police officers when military members get away with equal and worse poo than this

also the officer in this case was pretty clearly given an irrational sentence simply because the judge felt the victim was to blame. i mean she was pretty direct about it all.

Best post you have made.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

well

a ) in reference to sexual assault, it is a huge fuging problem in the military but for some reason that can't seem to be dealt with at all

b ) just happened to read an article recently that mentioned that no one has been executed under the ucmj since 1961

I thought you said 'I' get some preferential treatment? Seeing that I 1) keep my hands and body parts to myself or to my wife, and 2) am not on death row, I fail to see my preferential treatment.

Sexual assault is a problem in the entire US.

oddly enough, the UCMJ is one of the biggest the reasons the death penalty was reinstated in the US.

c ) you literally get points tacked on to your scores in testing for public sector jobs simply for enlisting to fight an unnecessary war

lol, no. you do get extra points, but only to secure an interview - not to "test" for a job.

these are three widely different examples of preferential treatment given simply for being a part of team america: world police. i just think it's funny that you've never understood preferential treatment for police officers when military members get away with equal and worse poo than this

lol i've seen harsher punishments for being less than 10 minutes early.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I thought you said 'I' get some preferential treatment? Seeing that I 1) keep my hands and body parts to myself or to my wife, and 2) am not on death row, I fail to see my preferential treatment.

Sexual assault is a problem in the entire US.

oddly enough, the UCMJ is one of the biggest the reasons the death penalty was reinstated in the US.

no the point is that you spent years in a military that actively suppresses accusations of rape and hell, outright murder, and yet you can't understand why some judges give preferential treatment to police (it's mostly because our relatively conservative united states has a collective hard-on for authority, wrt both the police and the military).

also sexual assault anywhere is a problem, but there are varying degrees. the military has a serious, serious problem with sexual assault.

lol, no. you do get extra points, but only to secure an interview - not to "test" for a job.

that's a pretty significant advantage

lol i've seen harsher punishments for being less than 10 minutes early.

yes and i've seen the aftermath of my lai

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites