Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

FirstRoundPick

Kuechly

234 posts in this topic

What? A LB to eat up blocks? You had the gameplan?

Not trying to be sarcastic, but there was not a safety or anyone else following thru most of those holes, so what would the point of just eating up a block be? LBs are there to stop the runners.

Luke takes in fullback=Beason making tackle which is why Beason led In tackles today. They ran straight college isolation plays all day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luke takes in fullback=Beason making tackle which is why Beason led In tackles today. They ran straight college isolation plays all day.

I will go back & look at the tape tomorrow beofre I respond, b/c that's not what I saw; I'm not willing to say you are worng or I am right, b/c I had my neices while watching the game...but schemes usually are not designed to loser a LBer on a block so the other can make the tackle. They are designed where LBers can be freed up to run to the ball & make the tackles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will go back & look at the tape tomorrow beofre I respond, b/c that's not what I saw; I'm not willing to say you are worng or I am right, b/c I had my neices while watching the game...but schemes usually are not designed to loser a LBer on a block so the other can make the tackle. They are designed where LBers can be freed up to run to the ball & make the tackles.

Actually he's right, and if you go back and look at the goal line play, it's exactly what Beason did for Davis when Davis stuffed Martin on the goal line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will go back & look at the tape tomorrow beofre I respond, b/c that's not what I saw; I'm not willing to say you are worng or I am right, b/c I had my neices while watching the game...but schemes usually are not designed to loser a LBer on a block so the other can make the tackle. They are designed where LBers can be freed up to run to the ball & make the tackles.

someone has to take the lead FB out of the equation so someone can then get the RB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never take another white boy LB again.

I wouldnt say that, i would say is make sure he can do more than make arm tackles. Seriously this kid doesnt do a good job rushing the passer and doesnt make big hits. But she is a stat stuffer so he looks better than he may be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today was funny because the Bucs played about as perfect as they are capable of and they won 16-10.

Our Offense was dogshit today....if we have any type of balance this game is alot different

I didnt understand why Kuechly was brought off the field so much. The catch Martin made was just a circus play..whatever....1 out of 50 he catches that...he's one of our impact coverage guys and we took him out of the game too much i thought

That's the whole point: We didn't ALLOW you to have balance. That was our game plan, take away the run and make Cam do it all by himself. 10 rushing yds allowed is no error on your part, it was the result of our intent to limit the run...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the whole point: We didn't ALLOW you to have balance. That was our game plan, take away the run and make Cam do it all by himself. 10 rushing yds allowed is no error on your part, it was the result of our intent to limit the run...

Have a cookie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt say that, i would say is make sure he can do more than make arm tackles. Seriously this kid doesnt do a good job rushing the passer and doesnt make big hits. But she is a stat stuffer so he looks better than he may be.

I was only joking.

But hindsight 20/20, look at highlights reel Kuechly was just a sure tackler. Not a big hitter or nothing more. He's no Beason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites