If I was right, and I get feed sugar coated statements from homers about how I am wrong, you bet your ass, I'm going to say I'm right. You want to make statements like McClain and Fua are fine, or Edwards will return punts for Adams then fine. But you will get called out on it. Please notice that I do not say anything drastically out of the realm of realism. Lets see I said Adams will be the punt returner, Fua, McClain arent an answer, we wont have a top 10 D, we have invested enough in RB's and LBers for now, and there isn't a LBer in this league including Kuechly that can cover Graham. I haven't said anything that reality isn't backing up for me.
I've been though this routine enough to know I'm going to get comments about how Richardson should hire fans on their couch, but that isn't the issue. I'm not claiming to be a genius. The stuff I harp on, I consider to be absolutely obvious. I mean are their actually people who think all McClain and Fua needed was time? Please people who watched the tape 5 times tell me how I need to go rewatch the tape to see that one time in the second quarter Fua got double teamed, and we need people who get double teamed.
First of all, my comment wasn't directed specifically at you, it is a tone that I've noticed on occasion from a variety of posters, and I just don't understand it. Say you think someone isn't the answer for us, or that they had a bad game, or don't fit our offense, etc. and most will respect your opinion. It is a matter of style. Case in point...
Kueckly starts his awesome DROY campaign by taking on blockers so someone else can make the tackles.
That just came off to me as kind of flippant, and gloating that he didn't have a great first game.
As to the rest of your comments about McClain and Fua and Edwards etc. you will have to take that up with the people that are strongly in their corner. I have some serious doubts myself, but I am not going to enter threads to say, "see, I was right, these guys are a joke". It's just a matter of style.