Kuechly
#91
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:39 PM
#92
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:40 PM
Pssst, we won today FRP. Don't let me interrupt your wrist cutting session though.
Me cutting my wrists must mean Kuechly is the best cover LBer of all time, and I just didn't know. You always attack the person and not the facts. If your whole post is to attack someone, it best just not to post.
#93
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:41 PM
#94
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:42 PM
So far you're an idiotJudging from these two games, and how many times they take Kuechly off the field, we wasted our first round pick this year. He's a tackling machine who's true position is MLB. So not only is he playing out of position, but we take him off the field for 75% of the defensive snaps. So far, Kuechly is a wasted pick.
#95
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:44 PM
Exactly. Nobody said he would be better than Beason, who is the defensive leader and rarely comes off the field. Then we have Anderson who is physical in coverage and can blitz, who also rotates with Davis and Luke in nickel packages. For these two trolls to think they can call our pick wasted is just admitting ignorance by using other words to do it.We have three veteran linebackers. Thomas Davis is back for real, as is Beason, and Anderson led the team last year in tackles. Why would we rush to start a rookie, even one as talented as Kuechly?
Is our defense better? Clearly.
#96
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:46 PM
Me cutting my wrists must mean Kuechly is the best cover LBer of all time, and I just didn't know. You always attack the person and not the facts. If your whole post is to attack someone, it best just not to post.
Who's attacking who again? All you DO is attack the team.
Kuechly is a rookie on a defense that got two turnovers today, one for a TD.
You are never happy about anything. Says more about you than anyone else.
#97
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:46 PM
#98
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:47 PM
#99
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:47 PM
Cox should have probably been the choice there.
We didn't need another MLB.
I do support the player though.
#100
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:48 PM
#101
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:48 PM
#102
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:50 PM
However, if something did happen to one of our LBs and we hadn't drafted Kuechly I'm sure you all would have been screaming bloody murder about how we should have taken him for depth
#103
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:53 PM
#104
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:53 PM
jury is still out. I haven't been impressed yet but he is splitting time with some other very good LBs who are just out playing him. I hope he pans out to be more than just an average LB.
However, if something did happen to one of our LBs and we hadn't drafted Kuechly I'm sure you all would have been screaming bloody murder about how we should have taken him for depth
Disagree.
We have 3 first rounder playing LB on a 4-3 team.
As much as I love all three players, that is just stupid.
#105
Posted 16 September 2012 - 03:55 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





