Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Nakurmara


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#1 chubs2496

chubs2496

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,185 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 10:48 PM

Did anybody else think he played very poorly. I saw Atleast a couple of plays where it looked as if he should have been over the top to help. Like the first td. Looked as if he bit on Freeman's eyes and didn't watch the inside. Bc clearly gamble let him go. And a couple more were similar. And the blocked punt I credit to him.

#2 LinvilleGorge

LinvilleGorge

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,371 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 10:52 PM

Meh, our safety play has been so poor the last few years that I rarely even notice it at this point. It's just assumed.

#3 Tarheels23

Tarheels23

    Keep Pounding

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,670 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 10:53 PM

Martin comes up with big hits at times on special teams. It'll be interesting to see if he wins his position back.

I'm just tired of the days of playing zone coverage while giving up so much cushion. Our D looked so much better when we manned up on everyone.

#4 chubs2496

chubs2496

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,185 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 10:56 PM

Yeah I agree. For some reason we get burned all the time in zone. I'm not saying our safety play was bad. Bc honestly I don't know what their assignments were. But I had high hopes for him mainly to step up and be a leader in the secondary. He fits the part being a ninjee and all

#5 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,132 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 09 September 2012 - 10:57 PM

I thought we couldve played 10 men on defense and it wouldnt have made a difference.
The dude clearly was a spectator on the field only.

#6 Frizzy350

Frizzy350

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,074 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:01 PM

Frankly I think the secondary played great after the first half. Gamble was in la la land and remembered how to play football after getting burned, and munnerlyn stopped drawing PIs (thats really the best we can expect with him unless playing the nickel).

After watching the first half i really thought we were only a few adjustments away from running away with the game. For the most part I think that was a fair assessment except for those interior olinemen...

#7 LinvilleGorge

LinvilleGorge

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,371 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:09 PM

The D definitely played MUCH better in the 2cd half.

#8 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 23,891 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:13 PM

I think Martin will earn his job back. He is just flat out more talented and still our best coverage S. 2011 was just bad.....but he has shown windows of good S play.

#9 philw5289

philw5289

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,289 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:20 PM

martin is probably better. wish we would have signed landry he looked like a beast today.

#10 rico6

rico6

    Shit.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,674 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:31 PM

Martin will win his job back simply because Nakamura is that bad.

#11 Irv

Irv

    Winner Best New Huddler

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,339 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:33 PM

nakamrura should of became a doctor and not a football player

#12 pantherj

pantherj

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,375 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:35 PM

There were plays when I thought I saw Naka completely ignoring recievers in his zone, but it's tv so I'm not sure. Naka starting over Martin is a joke talent wise imo.

#13 Tarheels23

Tarheels23

    Keep Pounding

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,670 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:51 PM

Martin is a much better saftey when he doesn't have to come down and make/assist in tackles. Naka made/assisted on about 3 tackles that I'm not sure Martin would've been about to assist on. It's like Martin is afraid to hit a moving target.

#14 rico6

rico6

    Shit.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,674 posts

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:54 PM

Martin's problem was that he can't play safety. The talent was and will always be there, he's just a perversion of Fox and Hurney's inability to develop talent.

#15 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,399 posts
  • LocationNC

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:58 PM

I'd love to draft a legit safety for once, not a conversion project.

We lost this game at the LOS, but FS is a need, IMO,


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.