Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Nakurmara


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#1 chubs2496

chubs2496

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,226
  • Reputation: 280
HUDDLER

Posted 09 September 2012 - 10:48 PM

Did anybody else think he played very poorly. I saw Atleast a couple of plays where it looked as if he should have been over the top to help. Like the first td. Looked as if he bit on Freeman's eyes and didn't watch the inside. Bc clearly gamble let him go. And a couple more were similar. And the blocked punt I credit to him.

#2 LinvilleGorge

LinvilleGorge

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,632
  • Reputation: 3,219
HUDDLER

Posted 09 September 2012 - 10:52 PM

Meh, our safety play has been so poor the last few years that I rarely even notice it at this point. It's just assumed.

#3 Tarheels23

Tarheels23

    Keep Pounding

  • Joined: 05-August 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,745
  • Reputation: 509
HUDDLER

Posted 09 September 2012 - 10:53 PM

Martin comes up with big hits at times on special teams. It'll be interesting to see if he wins his position back.

I'm just tired of the days of playing zone coverage while giving up so much cushion. Our D looked so much better when we manned up on everyone.

#4 chubs2496

chubs2496

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,226
  • Reputation: 280
HUDDLER

Posted 09 September 2012 - 10:56 PM

Yeah I agree. For some reason we get burned all the time in zone. I'm not saying our safety play was bad. Bc honestly I don't know what their assignments were. But I had high hopes for him mainly to step up and be a leader in the secondary. He fits the part being a ninjee and all

#5 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 09 September 2012 - 10:57 PM

I thought we couldve played 10 men on defense and it wouldnt have made a difference.
The dude clearly was a spectator on the field only.

#6 Frizzy350

Frizzy350

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,416
  • Reputation: 594
HUDDLER

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:01 PM

Frankly I think the secondary played great after the first half. Gamble was in la la land and remembered how to play football after getting burned, and munnerlyn stopped drawing PIs (thats really the best we can expect with him unless playing the nickel).

After watching the first half i really thought we were only a few adjustments away from running away with the game. For the most part I think that was a fair assessment except for those interior olinemen...

#7 LinvilleGorge

LinvilleGorge

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,632
  • Reputation: 3,219
HUDDLER

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:09 PM

The D definitely played MUCH better in the 2cd half.

#8 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,138
  • Reputation: 5,290
Moderators

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:13 PM

I think Martin will earn his job back. He is just flat out more talented and still our best coverage S. 2011 was just bad.....but he has shown windows of good S play.

#9 philw5289

philw5289

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-January 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,578
  • Reputation: 551
HUDDLER

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:20 PM

martin is probably better. wish we would have signed landry he looked like a beast today.

#10 rico6

rico6

    Shit.

  • Joined: 03-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,760
  • Reputation: 224
HUDDLER

Posted 09 September 2012 - 11:31 PM

Martin will win his job back simply because Nakamura is that bad.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users