Did the Bucs scout us @ IMG?
#1
Posted 10 September 2012 - 08:29 AM
It was a lackluster performance yesterday, but there were more than a few plays on offense where it seemed like the Bucs were in the huddle with us...
You've gotta figure that IMG is crawling with employees that are Bucs fans, wonder if any of them were spying on us and sharing info with the Bucs?
#2
Posted 10 September 2012 - 08:31 AM
#3
Posted 10 September 2012 - 08:32 AM
#4
Posted 10 September 2012 - 08:32 AM
Of course, due to the dumbasses at Fox we here in Wilmington missed the entire first quarter watching every last fuging second of the NO - WSH game... so I can't say what the start of the game looked like.
#5
Posted 10 September 2012 - 08:34 AM
What most likely happened is they hired that guy from the movie Inception and the Bucs had him plant the idea in Chud's mind that he should fart in the general direction of our highly invested backfield.
#6
Posted 10 September 2012 - 08:37 AM
#7
Posted 10 September 2012 - 08:37 AM
I didn't wonder this until you said it but, I was saying during the chat yesterday that it just seemed ridiculous, like they knew what we were going to run before we ran it.I know I'm probably going to catch hell for this, but am I the only person wondering if the Bucs scouted us a little @ IMG?
It was a lackluster performance yesterday, but there were more than a few plays on offense where it seemed like the Bucs were in the huddle with us...
You've gotta figure that IMG is crawling with employees that are Bucs fans, wonder if any of them were spying on us and sharing info with the Bucs?
Just seemed too easy for them, and Chud even tried stuff we didn't run a lot last year. I remember they had the double screen perfectly defended and everytime we tried to run the option they killed it. And Schiano seems like a dirtbag, so it wouldn't surprise me. It's not like they shut down all of IMG just because we were staying there.
Still goes on Rivera, IMO.
#9
Posted 10 September 2012 - 08:40 AM
We claim to run an attacking-style offense and defense that dictates the action rather than react to it. Well, yesterday, the Bucs proved they were better at executing that style of play than we were, and that is what is so troubling considering they have a 1st year coach who has mostly worked in college.
#10
Posted 10 September 2012 - 08:43 AM
I didn't wonder this until you said it but, I was saying during the chat yesterday that it just seemed ridiculous, like they knew what we were going to run before we ran it.
Just seemed too easy for them, and Chud even tried stuff we didn't run a lot last year. I remember they had the double screen perfectly defended and everytime we tried to run the option they killed it. And Schiano seems like a dirtbag, so it wouldn't surprise me. It's not like they shut down all of IMG just because we were staying there.
Still goes on Rivera, IMO.
Yeah, even if they did scout us the coaching staff failed to make enough adjustments.
#11
Posted 10 September 2012 - 09:08 AM
#12
Posted 10 September 2012 - 09:55 AM
#13
Posted 10 September 2012 - 10:58 AM
#14
Posted 10 September 2012 - 01:40 PM
I know I'm probably going to catch hell for this, but am I the only person wondering if the Bucs scouted us a little @ IMG?
It was a lackluster performance yesterday, but there were more than a few plays on offense where it seemed like the Bucs were in the huddle with us...
You've gotta figure that IMG is crawling with employees that are Bucs fans, wonder if any of them were spying on us and sharing info with the Bucs?
Dear Cat Man72,
Yeah, IMG may be crawling with Bucs fans and employees of our team, and certainly, they may have recording devices like that which is available on a typical android smartphone which would generate an audio or video file depending on which program you use.
I can assure you, I authorized no recording of our practices, even if my mentor is the Patriots head coach, Bill whom is notorious for filming everything to include his preparation of TV dinners.
#15
Posted 10 September 2012 - 02:06 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






