Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Team needs


  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

#31 pilot2011

pilot2011

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 07-May 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 372
  • Reputation: 158
HUDDLER

Posted 11 September 2012 - 12:39 AM

well we got Amini in the draft, so we did address a guard need...it would have been unrealistic to bring in 2 rookie guards in the draft...Hangman will be hangin it up after this season, (as starter anyway). He is better as a rotational/backup all purpose offensive lineman anyway.

#32 SOJA

SOJA

    Official Panthers Fan

  • Joined: 09-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,479
  • Reputation: 1,745
HUDDLER

Posted 11 September 2012 - 12:47 AM

S, CB, WR, OG, OT in no particular order

#33 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • posts: 7,325
  • Reputation: 1,841
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 September 2012 - 12:49 AM

IMO, S, DT, OL. The DTs played well yesterday, but Ron will need replacing soon. I think we're good at WR for a while, unless somehow we're drafting high and have a chance at a really elite one. I think we could probably be most helped by spending our first pick on a FS. Can probably get an impact player with our 1st pick regardless of where it is.

RE: the comment about vet DTs outplaying our highly drafted DTs...when was the last time we spent a remotely high draft pick on a DT? The closest thing I can remember is Jenkins in the 2nd....I'd hardly call 3rd round picks "high draft picks".

#34 Mainter

Mainter

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 01-January 09
  • posts: 41
  • Reputation: 0
ROOKIE

Posted 11 September 2012 - 02:15 AM

If Hangartner gets abused again in the next game, we could try to kick Bell inside to Guard and start Bruce Campbell at RT?

#35 cultclassiccat

cultclassiccat

    flash

  • Joined: 18-March 12
  • posts: 1,743
  • Reputation: 375
  • LocationG spot
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 September 2012 - 02:42 AM

Gettis and Stew healthy.

Clean pee for Neblett.



#36 KillerKat

KillerKat

    To Hell With Bell

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,392
  • Reputation: 4,555
HUDDLER

Posted 11 September 2012 - 06:23 AM

More revisionist history. Nobody was calling for a new RG last offseason, other than perhaps for depth. I remember this clearly for one reason...I made a post at the end of last year that said that Hangman had played poorly late in the year, and just about everyone came to his defense talking about how solid he was.



You must not have read other people's posts outside of your thread

#37 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,136
  • Reputation: 5,289
Moderators

Posted 11 September 2012 - 07:33 AM

If Hangartner gets abused again in the next game, we could try to kick Bell inside to Guard and start Bruce Campbell at RT?

That is what I wanted before the season started.

Bell had good and bad at RT on Sun. He got beat....but so did our Pro Bowlers

#38 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 11 September 2012 - 07:38 AM

A stud WR to compliment 89, but I'll let Lafell or Murphy try to prove me wrong.

I can live with the two Edwards as our DT next year.

Not going to draft another Guard that that high next year.

Major need: DE, S, CB

#39 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • Joined: 11-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,934
  • Reputation: 894
  • LocationDa City
HUDDLER

Posted 11 September 2012 - 07:44 AM

WR, DT, DE, S, OT, OG, CB no order.

#40 Rip Saw

Rip Saw

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 04-July 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 536
  • Reputation: 63
HUDDLER

Posted 11 September 2012 - 07:48 AM

We need more starting running backs

we clearly don't have enough after watching the last game. Need at least 4 to have a good running game


how can you say that when our line backing corps is so weak?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users