Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

People happy about us facing a depleted Giants team.

108 posts in this topic

Posted

If we win tomorrow night I'm going to feel good, regardless of whether we played a high school team or the Giants. I'd hate to sound Fox-y, but a win is a win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Jesus Christ I never said the win is meaningless.

Look, let me point this out. We ended up with the 25th hardest strength of schedule in 2008. As a result of being decent, but not playing any goddamnbody we got shitcanned by the Cardinals. At home. After a bye week.

So you can root for our competition to be watered down and non-threatening if you have no testicles, but I'd prefer to play teams that have all their players healthy as often as humanly possibly. Especially if we're playing the Super Bowl champs. The Giants are still a very good team even with the injuries, but if we beat them when they're fully healthy, ESPECIALLY if we REALLY beat them, that tells us a lot about our team. A victory tomorrow still tells us a lot, but if we face the giants again in the post season, we may not have the luxury of facing them when they're hurting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I think you just wanted some company.

This is going to probably go for 10 pages, great job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I just wanna win, don't care how it happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

No one victory tells you "a lot" about a team. Just look at how good Dallas played after making the Giants look pedestrian in the season opener. Injuries have never stopped the Giants from winning a game before, and they're the defending superbowl champions.

I'm not a stickler for the whole "gotta beat a team at 100%" thing either. Last year with a depleted depth chart we lost plenty of games to teams we might've been able to beat if we were healthier. It's just the way the league works. Most teams don't overcome multiple injuries and we've gotten the short end of that stick overall in recent years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

/see RB post

/gets excited because RB and SD89 usually are on the same page

/not on the same page

/leaves thread hurt but not conceding defeat!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

that's chivalrous and all but i'd be content playing teams' third string quarterbacks every game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Jesus Christ I never said the win is meaningless.

Look, let me point this out. We ended up with the 25th hardest strength of schedule in 2008. As a result of being decent, but not playing any goddamnbody we got shitcanned by the Cardinals. At home. After a bye week.

So you can root for our competition to be watered down and non-threatening if you have no testicles, but I'd prefer to play teams that have all their players healthy as often as humanly possibly. Especially if we're playing the Super Bowl champs. The Giants are still a very good team even with the injuries, but if we beat them when they're fully healthy, ESPECIALLY if we REALLY beat them, that tells us a lot about our team. A victory tomorrow still tells us a lot, but if we face the giants again in the post season, we may not have the luxury of facing them when they're hurting.

We got stomped by the Cards in 08 because Jake Delhomme decided to turn the ball over repeatedly. The defense didn't play THAT bad, but goddamn, they were on the field all night (I remember, I was there). It had less to do with our regular season competition and more to do with individual play for that game.

I get what you're saying, but to make a thread basically saying, "eh, this win will be cool, but it still doesn't tell us much", I'd argue that your ignorant. We just beat one of the best offenses in football, without a head coach or not, that is impressive. Then, if we beat the Giants, that is TWO GOOD TEAMS IN A 5 DAY PERIOD! Regardless of whether or not either the Saints or Giants are fully healthy is irrelevant at that point. They're still a good team, by your own admission, and so the win still tells us plenty. If we face them in the postseason, win or lose tomorrow, we just add the "cover Nicks" and "be ready for a more potent run game" to the scouting report. That is it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Btw, we were going toe to toe WITH Brees last season at home WITH Sean Payton. We only lost by three points...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Pantherclaw shall decide this. If he sides with you guys, you have to admit your position is indefensible because pantherclaw is dumb, dumb person. If he sides with me, I will likewise admit my foolhardiness.

Agreed?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I don't think that's fair to either side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

/see RB post

/gets excited because RB and SD89 usually are on the same page

/not on the same page

/leaves thread hurt but not conceding defeat!

Sorry-Spiderman-pinata.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites