Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

These refs have got to go


  • Please log in to reply
159 replies to this topic

#71 Sword

Sword

    Ninja Pirate

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,174
  • Reputation: 44
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2012 - 12:07 AM

it's weird because the review people upstairs are the regular guys from years past; you would think they would have told the booth ref that that was a clear interception.

#72 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,072
  • Reputation: 995
  • LocationGalveston
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2012 - 12:11 AM

Watched the entire fourth quarter.

Pretty fricking exciting game.

I don't feel bad for the Packers. Boo hoo.

#73 The Special One

The Special One

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 15-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,228
  • Reputation: 120
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2012 - 12:13 AM

What a disaster for the league. That's embarrassing.

#74 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,436
  • Reputation: 3,529
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2012 - 12:13 AM

Dear dipsh*ts,

the review was not to see who actually had possession. dual possession is a judgement call and cannot be overturned in a review. the review was did tate maintain possession when he landed, which he did.

#75 Dilla

Dilla

    Mad Decent

  • Joined: 03-October 09
  • posts: 1,927
  • Reputation: 175
  • LocationWashington, North Carolina
SUPPORTER

Posted 25 September 2012 - 12:14 AM

Lol. . . looking at the replay again, one of Tate's hands wasn't even on the ball going down, he was grabbing onto Jennings' arm trying to get leverage.

#76 BeasonBeastingBacks

BeasonBeastingBacks

    Farewell Sweet Prince

  • Joined: 29-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,480
  • Reputation: 515
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2012 - 12:15 AM

I kind of like them

#77 cookinbrak

cookinbrak

    tastes like chicken...

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,648
  • Reputation: 770
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2012 - 12:15 AM

ESPN is being so objective about this....

#78 BBQ&Beer

BBQ&Beer

    The good actor

  • Joined: 20-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,965
  • Reputation: 716
  • LocationMissouri
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2012 - 12:17 AM

Yeah, it was the dual possession call that was blown.

#79 SgtJoo

SgtJoo

    Reppin that Bull City

  • Joined: 11-January 09
  • posts: 4,149
  • Reputation: 1,906
  • LocationDurham, NC
SUPPORTER

Posted 25 September 2012 - 12:19 AM

it's weird because the review people upstairs are the regular guys from years past; you would think they would have told the booth ref that that was a clear interception.


can't overturn possession from the booth

#80 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,436
  • Reputation: 3,529
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2012 - 12:20 AM

Yeah, it was the dual possession call that was blown.


and having the real refs back would have fixed that? it was a split second play, no slo-mo no replays

it was a tough call for anyone to make


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users