Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

If we beat the Falcons what do you think will be the biggest difference


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#31 SmittyistheGOAT

SmittyistheGOAT

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 340 posts

Posted 28 September 2012 - 03:55 PM

that stone faced fugger Rivera grows something that resembles a brain.

#32 panther4life

panther4life

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,654 posts

Posted 28 September 2012 - 03:58 PM

Where is all the posters who think we lack the talent to pull out a winning season? If you believe that then you should have no problem guranteeing a loss to the Falcons. Mike Smith has a more proven track record and experience as a coach, so I doubt any of you think we are going to outcoach them.

#33 DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

DeAngelo's #1 Fan(CRA)

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 25,392 posts

Posted 28 September 2012 - 04:03 PM

We do have a coordinator that enjoys running nothing but college plays and continues to show no respect to opposing defenses. It doesn't really matter if you have the talent when you have coaches who don't know how to use it.


Well when Stewart is healthy....college ball is too much for most defenses to defend.

#34 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,601 posts

Posted 28 September 2012 - 05:40 PM

Also, hate to say it...no Jstew,no run game..no W.


It's not just the drop in talent when Stewart isn't playing (which is still huge), it's that Chud can't handle losing him and won't make any adjustments for the other running backs on the roster.


Aren't you guys ignoring the fact that DWill ran well in both the NO and NY game (yes, even out of the read option)? The problem with NY wasn't that DWill wasn't running as well as Stew would have. It's that we chose not to use him, tried to force runs for Cam (which the Giants were keyed on) and just generally played like crap over all.

I can't understand those that think Stew is the key off anecdotal evidence in a couple of games.

#35 La Pantera

La Pantera

    humpin' habanero

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,699 posts

Posted 28 September 2012 - 06:34 PM

fixed

It's not just the drop in talent when Stewart isn't playing (which is still huge), it's that Chud can't handle losing him and won't make any adjustments for the other running backs on the roster.



I agree with this for the most part. Dlo wasn't horrible but his physicality brings more to the O. Dlo was ok in the option, but Stew is head n shoulders better in that area. If Stew is out there should be more conventional formations. And for godsake get the man to the outside.

#36 La Pantera

La Pantera

    humpin' habanero

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,699 posts

Posted 28 September 2012 - 06:44 PM

Aren't you guys ignoring the fact that DWill ran well in both the NO and NY game (yes, even out of the read option)? The problem with NY wasn't that DWill wasn't running as well as Stew would have. It's that we chose not to use him, tried to force runs for Cam (which the Giants were keyed on) and just generally played like crap over all.

I can't understand those that think Stew is the key off anecdotal evidence in a couple of games.



I don't think Dlo was horrible by any means. I just don't think he's as dangerous of a weapon in the option and is better suited on runs to the outside and cut backs. When Stews in the game he brings more of a physicality. He's also better suited in the zone reads and options. IMO the offense is more dangerous when we can use both to their strengths, not try and use them in the same fashion. Also for those saying in the off season how Tolbert could take Stews spot! I THINK NOT!!!

#37 LA_Panther

LA_Panther

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,583 posts

Posted 28 September 2012 - 07:11 PM

from what we have displayed so far. Or feel free to gurantee a loss thanks to our team sucking so bad from a talent perspective if that's the way you feel.

I say the coaches. What about you guys?


I didn't mean to 'pie you'...but oh well

My answer - 3 words...Chud, McDumbass, Adjustments

#38 Tony Diesel

Tony Diesel

    NEWB

  • NEWB
  • Pip
  • 16 posts

Posted 28 September 2012 - 07:56 PM

defensive players that move their feet occasionally.


Posted Image

#39 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,836 posts

Posted 29 September 2012 - 12:42 AM

COACHING flat out!!! We do have a decently talented roster especially on offense. We start having a better game plan and an actual identity on defense(aggressive man coverage and blitzing) then well put up a game

#40 OnlyPantherFaninMaine

OnlyPantherFaninMaine

    All In.

  • ALL-PRO
  • 6,392 posts
  • LocationBrooklyn, NY

Posted 29 September 2012 - 01:34 AM

Defense forces a turnover or two. Or three.

#41 Mr. Burgundy

Mr. Burgundy

    scotch, scotch, scotch

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 370 posts

Posted 29 September 2012 - 01:40 AM

Offense scores 30+ and defense does not give them big plays

#42 jayflip

jayflip

    vaya con dios

  • ALL-PRO
  • 2,777 posts
  • LocationSan Diego

Posted 29 September 2012 - 02:24 AM

That Giant game wasn't a true indictment of our team. We were not ready and had vanilla defensive looks, unimaginative offensive play calling and just looked wildly unprepared. That was a great exsmple of piss poor coaching and bad execution, which is still a product of piss poor coaching.

The talent is there. This O can be unstoppable if the OLine holds up and Chud doesn't try to force a gameplan that can be read from a mile away. It didn't help that JPP made Gary fuging Williams his prison bitch all night.

I really do believe we have a chance against the falcons. A good chance, at that. Our O can go toe to toe with theirs, it's just a matter of our DLine actually getting pressure. Hopefully the coaching staff realized that relying on our underwhelming front four alone isn't enough. There needs to be a creative game plan in place to get some semblance of pressure in Matty Ryan's face.

#43 NiteFalcon

NiteFalcon

    Bird of Prey

  • NEWB
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts

Posted 29 September 2012 - 02:49 AM

I can't see the panthers defense doing a ton to slow down the falcons offense at the georgia dome. SOO the only way I see the panthers winning is if they jump out to a fast lead and control the tempo of the game with a consistent rushing attack.

#44 jarhead

jarhead

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,621 posts
  • Locationnear Charlotte

Posted 29 September 2012 - 06:22 AM

Why is everyone so surprised our defense sucks? We all knew our secondary consisted of one cb and our DL did not have a single person that could apply constant pressure on a qb. Everyone was so enamored by the return of Beason did they feel he could compensate for every other flaw.

Our offense on the other hand is disappointing.Am I supposed to believe that coaches spend countless hours coming up with this crock of poop? And please someone tell Hurney to quit looking a prospects from D1 schools.I cant get the article out of my mind where the said he was giddy like a school girl watching the tape of that OG that we used a high 2nd round pick on and how he ran down the hall to show Rivera.If Hurney likes the prospects of these schools so much he ought to get a job with one.We dont need anymore AEs on the team

#45 jarhead

jarhead

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,621 posts
  • Locationnear Charlotte

Posted 29 September 2012 - 06:27 AM

Where is all the posters who think we lack the talent to pull out a winning season? If you believe that then you should have no problem guranteeing a loss to the Falcons. Mike Smith has a more proven track record and experience as a coach, so I doubt any of you think we are going to outcoach them.

There are no guarantees but if we play like we did against the Giants we will lose.

If you are so confident lets take this offline and put your money where your mouth is.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com