Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

McDermott should be fired


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
96 replies to this topic

#37 Snake

Snake

    Rivera did What???

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,942
  • Reputation: 1,359
HUDDLER

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:23 PM

So he should have put in Martin? He suck worse. Everyone wanted him cut last year.


So they should have done what they did and let a guy who was beat twice in one game have another crack at it? Adjustments should have been made somehow. Martin or not.

#38 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:26 PM

My biggest concern with the entire game is the defensive playcalling.

Blitzed them their entire first possession. Shut them down completely. So, as a result of that success, we stop blitzing most of the rest of the game. I just don't get it.

And Chud, please, please, please stop being cute with the playcalling. Smith is not a RB. Let him play WR. Let the millions of dollars wrapped up into the backfield handle that.

Dag! Can't believe we lost that game. Can not believe we lost that game.


I still think it is silly people are complaining about the play call of Smith running a WR reverse.....even conservative Fox used those with Smith.

Good play call...bad job by Smitty. His play has been questionable for 2 straight weeks.

#39 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,321
  • Reputation: 5,871
HUDDLER

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:26 PM

So they should have done what they did and let a guy who was beat twice in one game have another crack at it? Adjustments should have been made somehow. Martin or not.


I don't blame the coaches for that play. You call the right coverage and expect these professionals to make the okay. They dud't.

That being said, I am not a fan if McDermott. Dud not like the hire when we made it and still don't. He is over rated.

#40 Borat

Borat

    Very Nice, I Like!

  • Joined: 26-August 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 599
  • Reputation: 419
HUDDLER

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:27 PM

Oh well, Thomas Decoud should be a stand-up comedian in his spare time according to most on this board and I hope you all DVR'd the game so you can see Jimmy Neutron's fine young male ass wording "Get the f*ck out of our house!" after they nailed that FG on us.

Hahahaha

#41 Montsta

Montsta

    Rest In Peace

  • Joined: 08-December 08
  • posts: 8,218
  • Reputation: 7,080
Moderators

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:28 PM

So he should have put in Martin? He suck worse. Everyone wanted him cut last year.


Martin gets routinely burned trying to make the big play and getting jukes out of his shoes. If he is in a position where all he has to do is float over the top of the receiver being covered in man to man I think he'd be better at the jump ball than Nak. Nak couldn't time a jump to save his life today and got eaten up twice because of it. So yes, Martin isn't very good either. But in that particular situation (99 yards, 59 seconds, no timeouts), I think he would have been the lesser of two evils.

#42 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,321
  • Reputation: 5,871
HUDDLER

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:29 PM

I still think it is silly people are complaining about the play call of Smith running a WR reverse.....even conservative Fox uses those with Smith


I like using these kind of plays as a change if pace. Chud runs too many gimmicks and college read option plays as our base offense. Teams have figured out how to play it...much like they did with the wildcat.

Run a traditional offense and sprinkle in some wrinkles. Don't relegate this offense to one that depends on gimmicks.


#43 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,321
  • Reputation: 5,871
HUDDLER

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:30 PM

Martin gets routinely burned trying to make the big play and getting jukes out of his shoes. If he is in a position where all he has to do is float over the top of the receiver being covered in man to man I think he'd be better at the jump ball than Nak. Nak couldn't time a jump to save his life today and got eaten up twice because of it. So yes, Martin isn't very good either. But in that particular situation (99 yards, 59 seconds, no timeouts), I think he would have been the lesser of two evils.


I see your point.

I think bringing in a player off the bench in the final minute like that us riskier though...esoecually when Martin suck too.



#44 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:31 PM

I like using these kind of plays as a change if pace. Chud runs too many gimmicks and college read option plays as our base offense. Teams have figured out how to play it...much like they did with the wildcat.

Run a traditional offense and sprinkle in some wrinkles. Don't relegate this offense to one that depends on gimmicks.


College O works pretty good as is....pending Stewart isn't hurt.

I can see people complaining about running it if Stewart is hurt....fact is with Stewart it is one of the most productive in the league in 12 and 11

#45 Cpt slay a ho

Cpt slay a ho

    Lord Flacko

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,536
  • Reputation: 543
HUDDLER

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:37 PM

quick question how is smitty play last week questionable?

#46 Montsta

Montsta

    Rest In Peace

  • Joined: 08-December 08
  • posts: 8,218
  • Reputation: 7,080
Moderators

Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:39 PM

I see your point.

I think bringing in a player off the bench in the final minute like that us riskier though...esoecually when Martin suck too.


This is true and I'm sure if they put him in and he fuged up I'd be blowing my top even worse, but Nak just got burned so bad today it's frustrating that no adjustments were made.

#47 Snake

Snake

    Rivera did What???

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,942
  • Reputation: 1,359
HUDDLER

Posted 30 September 2012 - 06:36 PM

I don't blame the coaches for that play. You call the right coverage and expect these professionals to make the okay. They dud't.

That being said, I am not a fan if McDermott. Dud not like the hire when we made it and still don't. He is over rated.



Joe Adams should still be starting because he gets payed also. So why the hell was he not out there this sunday? Yup cause he could not handle it... You bench people when they do not fit the play you call and it was clear by the 3rd QT that Naka was getting picked on.

#48 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 30 September 2012 - 06:40 PM

quick question how is smitty play last week questionable?


Didn't block on what would have been an easy TD for Williams to tie the game at 7-7, costly penalty killing a drive (inexcusable for a vet WR to get called for a false start..,,

Those were big negative plays by Smith against NY, he had more today.