Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Carolina-Chuck's 2013 outlook and mock draft


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
33 replies to this topic

#16 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 12,780
  • Reputation: 2,458
Moderators

Posted 02 October 2012 - 10:02 AM

Stranger things has happened.
And yea trading up in this new CBA is cheaper . Teams are willing to move up now.


I wouldn't base my predictions on "stranger things have happened".

Us getting a 4th is a little more on the real side.

#17 Squirrel

Squirrel

    Drink a beer and relax

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • posts: 13,678
  • Reputation: 1,274
SUPPORTER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:03 AM

Hurney getting fired? If not no way trade down. We will trade up if anything with hurney.


#18 Captain Morgan

Captain Morgan

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 09-January 12
  • posts: 2,773
  • Reputation: 1,523
SUPPORTER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:59 AM

Amerson got benched last Saturday...his season has gone so bad he won't even be drafted
unless something dramatic happens.

#19 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:09 PM

I wouldn't base my predictions on "stranger things have happened".

Us getting a 4th is a little more on the real side.


You're going to tell me that a team that trades down from a top 7 pick is only going to get a 4th rd out of that mess?

Every team that wants to move up always have to give up atleast a 2nd rd with their current spot. We gave our 2nd to Philly to trade back up for Otah. We gave was it a 1st to take Everette Brown in the 2nd. Heck we had to give SF a 3rd next year to take Alexander in the 4th.

You're completely lost on the trading cost whatever its call again. Before the draft this year some people gave some great info on how the trading process and cost of trading up works. Go look it up! I can tell u it's not no 4th rd in return trading down that high. I'm sure all 32 teams wouldn't hesitate to think once about trading up if the cost was only a 4th rounder.

FYI, Dallas gave up their no.14 and no.45 to trade up to no.6 with TB. Nothing strange bout it.

#20 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:14 PM

Amerson got benched last Saturday...his season has gone so bad he won't even be drafted
unless something dramatic happens.


Sucks for the kid then.
If not Amerson, saying we hold a top 7th pick there are more than 7 true NFL stars in next year draft that a team will def wont to trade up for.

Just look at a team like Arizona. By the looks of it they may end up being a team with a lower pick next year. They will def look for a QB. Wouldn't rule them out trading up for a Logan Thomas or Geno Smith etc.

#21 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 12,780
  • Reputation: 2,458
Moderators

Posted 02 October 2012 - 02:12 PM

You're going to tell me that a team that trades down from a top 7 pick is only going to get a 4th rd out of that mess?

Every team that wants to move up always have to give up atleast a 2nd rd with their current spot. We gave our 2nd to Philly to trade back up for Otah. We gave was it a 1st to take Everette Brown in the 2nd. Heck we had to give SF a 3rd next year to take Alexander in the 4th.

You're completely lost on the trading cost whatever its call again. Before the draft this year some people gave some great info on how the trading process and cost of trading up works. Go look it up! I can tell u it's not no 4th rd in return trading down that high. I'm sure all 32 teams wouldn't hesitate to think once about trading up if the cost was only a 4th rounder.

FYI, Dallas gave up their no.14 and no.45 to trade up to no.6 with TB. Nothing strange bout it.


What did I say? Go back and read.

Dallas was the only one to give up a second rounder and they jumped quite a few spots and were going after a very specific player: One they stupidly thought was the missing piece.

The rules have changed, killer. The norm to move up a few slots this past year was a 4th. To jump way up, you may give up a second (or a first in the case of Washington pursuing RGIII), but the old draft value chart is null and void with the new rookie wage scale.

We might could get a 2nd with a top 7 pick, but it's much more likely we won't than we will. It's rare to have teams jumping way up. More common will be trades like Jacksonville giving up a 4th rounder to move from the 7th pick to the 5th.

#22 Growl

Growl

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,086
  • Reputation: 4,336
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 03:15 PM

lol at the entire OP.

#23 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,116
  • Reputation: 5,726
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 05:07 PM

I don't think this team is finishing 4-12.

#24 RufftownRepresent

RufftownRepresent

    Formerly Know As Ruff

  • Joined: 27-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,041
  • Reputation: 2,647
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 05:59 PM

Nothing here is realistic.


God, isn't that the truth.

#25 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 08:36 PM

God, isn't that the truth.


Let me see a mock from you.

#26 RufftownRepresent

RufftownRepresent

    Formerly Know As Ruff

  • Joined: 27-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,041
  • Reputation: 2,647
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 09:03 PM

Let me see a mock from you.


You did, I was mocking you.

#27 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 03 October 2012 - 09:16 AM

You did, I was mocking you.


Hate people who are just all talk

#28 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 18,756
  • Reputation: 6,774
SUPPORTER

Posted 06 October 2012 - 09:57 AM

Hate people who are just all talk


Sucks for you then, seeing as this is a message board and all.

#29 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 06 October 2012 - 04:38 PM

Sucks for you then, seeing as this is a message board and all.


yea i know, sucks for me

#30 R0CKnR0LLA

R0CKnR0LLA

    Drunk Posting

  • Joined: 03-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,128
  • Reputation: 4,077
HUDDLER

Posted 06 October 2012 - 06:31 PM

I glanced over it, saw something about Wade Phillips and switching to a 3-4 defense and then I just stopped reading.