is josh norman just to slow to get it done?
#16
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:33 PM
#17
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:33 PM
#18
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:34 PM
I ve seen more of him chasing wrs from behind than him being in a position of power. I'm sure if you pull up times targeted by starting rookie cbs, he would be leading for most yards allowed.
A lot of the time that he's "following" is scheme related. He's looked pretty good in press coverage in crossing routes and anything under 15 yards. On go routes, or any deep route really, with our two deep nickle sets, he releases the top of the route to the safety and falls to underneath coverage - that's a scheme set up and not a coverage failure. Unfortunately Nakamura sucks balls.
As to your targeted yards point; he would likely be near the top. There's a few reasons for that. Very little rookie corners have started every game as a number two this year, and we've played three very prolific passing teams out of our four games.
Norman looks to be progressing fine in my eyes.
#19
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:37 PM
#20
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:38 PM
This thread is $hit! Kuechly deserves this thread, not Norman.
#21
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:40 PM
Norman has played better than a lot of players on our Defense and he's a 5th rounder rookie.
This thread is $hit! Kuechly deserves this thread, not Norman.
Ummm pretty sure luke played better than norman last game. Get some game tape.
#22
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:42 PM
I dont see mo getting beaten by teams 4th wrs either. Morris looks like hes competing out there,josh looks a few steps behind is all im saying.
Hasnt looked good tonight against the Bears.
#23
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:44 PM
#24
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:44 PM
I dont see mo getting beaten by teams 4th wrs either. Morris looks like hes competing out there,josh looks a few steps behind is all im saying.
Might want to turn on MNF. 'Mo' just got beaten for a 40 yard TD by the Bears' 4th WR.
#25
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:46 PM
Hasnt looked good tonight against the Bears.
mo looks very physical to me.
#26
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:49 PM
#27
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:57 PM
Ummm pretty sure luke played better than norman last game. Get some game tape.
As a no.9 pick he plays like poo.
You're going to compare Norman to Claiborne who was drafted 4 rounds ahead of him. That's just stupid.
Go and look at lbs drafted after Luke (Wagner and David), theyre playing much better than him right now.
#28
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:57 PM
#29
Posted 01 October 2012 - 09:58 PM
#30
Posted 01 October 2012 - 10:00 PM
mo looks very physical to me.
He's the 6th pick in the draft.
Norman is a 5th rounder.
You dont compare Munnerlyn to Revis. I don't see why you're trying to prove a case at comparing Norman to Claiborne.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





