how long did the falcons have 6 OL on the field?
#1
Posted 02 October 2012 - 10:00 AM
#2
Posted 02 October 2012 - 10:04 AM
#3
Posted 02 October 2012 - 10:50 AM
#4
Posted 02 October 2012 - 10:53 AM
#5
Posted 02 October 2012 - 10:59 AM
#6
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:05 AM
#7
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:06 AM
i know. i was just curious and i wonder if this is going to be something that we see in the future from other teams.It's Seahawks week now
if it is i hope that we can capitalize on it.
#8
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:09 AM
#9
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:14 AM
#10
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:33 AM
#11
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:35 AM
I was just posting one example to reinforce what you saw. It probably did happen a few times. Johnson was abusing Clabo like a rag doll.i could have sworn i saw them in for more than that, though.
#12
Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:02 PM
#13
Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:03 PM
I don't know about that many snaps but it was definitely quite a few.i was at the game guys.. they had 6 linemen in the game for at LEAST 25-30 snaps.. the refs were constantly saying 60 is an eligible reciever
#14
Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:12 PM
good to know.i was at the game guys.. they had 6 linemen in the game for at LEAST 25-30 snaps.. the refs were constantly saying 60 is an eligible reciever
still sucks we weren't able to capitalize on them being without one more skill position on the field but i think this bodes well for our pass rush. not every team would be able to compensate for that loss of a skill position the way the falcons did.
i can't wait to see what we can do to that rookie midget throwing the ball in seattle with his receiving corps.
#15
Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:17 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





