Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

how long did the falcons have 6 OL on the field?


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#11 Falcons1stPanthers2nd

Falcons1stPanthers2nd

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,066
  • Reputation: 197
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:35 AM

i could have sworn i saw them in for more than that, though.

I was just posting one example to reinforce what you saw. It probably did happen a few times. Johnson was abusing Clabo like a rag doll.

#12 Panthers4lyfe

Panthers4lyfe

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 20-September 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 428
  • Reputation: 44
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:02 PM

i was at the game guys.. they had 6 linemen in the game for at LEAST 25-30 snaps.. the refs were constantly saying 60 is an eligible reciever

#13 Falcons1stPanthers2nd

Falcons1stPanthers2nd

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,066
  • Reputation: 197
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:03 PM

i was at the game guys.. they had 6 linemen in the game for at LEAST 25-30 snaps.. the refs were constantly saying 60 is an eligible reciever

I don't know about that many snaps but it was definitely quite a few.

#14 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,896
  • Reputation: 7,798
Moderators

Posted 02 October 2012 - 12:12 PM

i was at the game guys.. they had 6 linemen in the game for at LEAST 25-30 snaps.. the refs were constantly saying 60 is an eligible reciever

good to know.

still sucks we weren't able to capitalize on them being without one more skill position on the field but i think this bodes well for our pass rush. not every team would be able to compensate for that loss of a skill position the way the falcons did.


i can't wait to see what we can do to that rookie midget throwing the ball in seattle with his receiving corps.

#15 tiger7_88

tiger7_88

    old skool SWAG

  • Joined: 12-May 11
  • posts: 5,749
  • Reputation: 2,486
SUPPORTER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:17 PM

They had that sixth OL lined up at fullback for some of those plays.

#16 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,416
  • Reputation: 1,707
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 01:48 PM

i saw on the close your eyes and throw up a prayer play they had about 7 olinemen, used a playaction and had only sent Jones and White deep with max protection. How they came up with that is embarrassing and pissing me off more each time I think about it.

#17 Urrymonster

Urrymonster

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,264
  • Reputation: 39
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 04:47 PM

11plays, but the falcons have done this before.

#18 panther4life

panther4life

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,655
  • Reputation: 1,181
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 06:17 PM

according to PFF it was 7 times.

#19 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 16-October 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,445
  • Reputation: 1,000
HUDDLER

Posted 02 October 2012 - 07:30 PM

They gashed us in the run game when they brought in extra o-lineman....we never really adjusted to that


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users