We blitz'd Gamble on the 59-yard catch to lose us the game
#1
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:32 PM
#2
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:35 PM
#3
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:37 PM
#4
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:41 PM
#5
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:42 PM
In Cover-2, the Panthers' last line of defense was free safety Haruki Nakamura, whose Sunday struggles may ultimately lead to his demotion.
Great play call there
#6
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:44 PM
#7
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:45 PM
#8
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:47 PM
We didn't blitz Gamble, his guy stayed in to block, which gives him the option to blitz or play an area. They maxed protected, there wasn't anyone in his area, so he rightfully blitzed.
Why the fug was he covering Harry Douglas instead of Julio or White? That's bullshit and terrible call by Mcterrible.
#9
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:55 PM
#10
Posted 02 October 2012 - 11:56 PM
Can't believe nobody's talking about the multiple O-Line holding penalties that occurred on that play (while Matt Ryan was in the end zone) that should have gotten us a safety and the win...
we're back to the normal refs now. it'll never happen in our favor.
#11
Posted 03 October 2012 - 12:26 AM
Why the fug was he covering Harry Douglas instead of Julio or White? That's bullshit and terrible call by Mcterrible.
We were in zone, and both Julio and White lined up on the left side of the field opposite of Gamble. It wouldn't make sense for Gamble to follow them over there when we're in a zone, but I agree there was a whole lot of things that were wrong on that play. We should've been in some type of prevent defense anyway. There's no way they were going to run the ball, and Rivera has got to know that.
#12
Posted 03 October 2012 - 12:42 AM
#13
Posted 03 October 2012 - 02:51 AM
1) Why do we have eight men in the box in that situation?
2) Why are we playing cover-2 zone?
#14
Posted 03 October 2012 - 03:19 AM
You are giving away single coverage deep.
Got to play 2 / 3 Man Under in that situation.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






