Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Sam Mills Fan

The Panthers now have the longest non-winning record streak in the league!

107 posts in this topic

It will help when Luke takes over MLB this Sunday....

Part of the reason I and others endorsed it was bc if the high odds Beason wouldn't be ready to play and be good. Beason isn't and now Luke gets his shot. Beason has hurt us

Luke is young but for a top 10 pick he has been underwhelming. Beason has been hampered by a shoulder injury also not the injury you said he never would recover from. The first round pick would have been better spent on a CB or DL and it has shown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luke is young but for a top 10 pick he has been underwhelming. Beason has been hampered by a shoulder injury also not the injury you said he never would recover from. The first round pick would have been better spent on a CB or DL and it has shown.

Who? Who should we have picked? And this is coming from a guy that wanted Fletcher Cox.

Beason has played like crap so far, and he's still hurt. If we didn't have Luke, we'd be in deep right now.

Kuechly has played very well for a rookie. The problem is, he's never on the field. For some reason, we think it's okay to throw a green rookie out on an island at #2 CB and at LG, but our top pick spends half of the game on the bench.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who? Who should we have picked? And this is coming from a guy that wanted Fletcher Cox.

Beason has played like crap so far, and he's still hurt. If we didn't have Luke, we'd be in deep right now.

Kuechly has played very well for a rookie. The problem is, he's never on the field. For some reason, we think it's okay to throw a green rookie out on an island at #2 CB and at LG, but our top pick spends half of the game on the bench.

Cox,Couples, Kirkpatrick or the CB out of S.Carolina would have been a upgrade. Also there is a reason that Norman is starting and keek is not. I'm not the coaches so I'm not going to speculate but his role has decreased not increased the past 4 weeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not panic time yet we were a play or two away from being 2-2. Hey when we were at 1-1 doesnt that eliminate the non winning streak? Anyway next two games have to be won to salvage the season. If we lose both then Ill look to the draft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not panic time yet we were a play or two away from being 2-2. Hey when we were at 1-1 doesnt that eliminate the non winning streak? Anyway next two games have to be won to salvage the season. If we lose both then Ill look to the draft.

We were a play or two away from being 11-5 last year as well. The difference between good teams and bad ones are the close games. I still say we end up 8-8 but no higher than that.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree sooner or later we have to drop "We have a young team Cliche" and have some and turn these games in our favor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, I have seen some manipulated stats, but this one takes the cake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depressing. This franchise has yet to feel like it can win consistently. Since inception.

A win tomorrow is a must going into a bye. Then hope remains.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you buy into this, it would basically mean that you think that 2001 was better than any of the past 4 seasons because we started off 1-0.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you buy into this, it would basically mean that you think that 2001 was better than any of the past 4 seasons because we started off 1-0.

Nothing to buy into. Panthers haven't been over .500 for a very long time. It's just one of those stats. It's a factual thing.

It means we haven't been great over that time. It says nothing about 2001.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as we're not as bad as the 2001 panthers!

(Pretty sad that we have stopped using the browns as our benchmark and started using our own shitty history as the benchmark)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason why the 2001 stat is stupid is because it's not a trend. It's literally just one game. The other one is over the course of years and it's in comparison to the rest of the league. Nothing really manipulative about it because we know we have suc-- I mean, been rebuilding, for too long. The statistic is just more conformation for what we already know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites