Jobless rate falls to 7.8%
#61
Posted 09 October 2012 - 12:28 PM
#62
Posted 09 October 2012 - 12:47 PM
#63
Posted 09 October 2012 - 02:16 PM
http://www.americant...suspicious.html
#64
Posted 09 October 2012 - 08:25 PM
And yet you blamed Bush and anyone who ever voted with him on the right for the collapse at the end of his term, when the Congress was strongly in control of the Democrats. You know, Pelosi and Reed? Ring a bell? As Ronald Reagan once said, Democrats do NOT spend like drunken sailors, simply because drunken sailors use their own money.
I blamed Bush for getting us into two unpaid for wars with a tax break for rich people along with a Medicare giveaway.
And I was right. All of them were his ideas. Yes he shamed the Dems into voting for the wars except for stand up people like Kerry, who was Swiftboated for his honesty.
Oh and all of those things? First Term. Shut up.
#65
Posted 09 October 2012 - 10:27 PM
I blamed Bush for getting us into two unpaid for wars with a tax break for rich people along with a Medicare giveaway.
And I was right. All of them were his ideas. Yes he shamed the Dems into voting for the wars except for stand up people like Kerry, who was Swiftboated for his honesty.
Oh and all of those things? First Term. Shut up.
Would Bush have gotten us into those wars if Clinton had taken care of Bin Laden when he had the chance? No? Allright then, YOU shut up!
Meat 7, Cookinwithoutgas 6.
#66
Posted 09 October 2012 - 10:38 PM
Would Bush have gotten us into those wars if Clinton had taken care of Bin Laden when he had the chance? No? Allright then, YOU shut up!
Meat 7, Cookinwithoutgas 6.
Wait a tic...off-topic...Are you Meat?
#67
Posted 09 October 2012 - 10:50 PM
Wait a tic...off-topic...Are you Meat?
No. As Nightwing is to Batman, I am to Meat. Meat stood for all that is right in this world, and I am here to carry on his legacy.
#68
Posted 09 October 2012 - 10:51 PM
No. As Nightwing is to Batman, I am to Meat. Meat stood for all that is right in this world, and I am here to carry on his legacy.
haha I gotta admit I chuckled a tad
#69
Posted 10 October 2012 - 07:41 AM
If the same % of americans were participating in labor force (either holding a job, or attempting to find a job) as when Obama took office, the unemployment rate would be 10.7%.
So for those of you balking about all of the people who have given up not being counted, that effect on the rate is almost 3%.
#70
Posted 10 October 2012 - 07:50 AM
Phone caller "did you do anything and make money this week?"
Recipient-- "I baby sitted for two hours"
Phone caller--part time job found
#71
Posted 10 October 2012 - 09:25 AM
Found this interesting
If the same % of americans were participating in labor force (either holding a job, or attempting to find a job) as when Obama took office, the unemployment rate would be 10.7%.
So for those of you balking about all of the people who have given up not being counted, that effect on the rate is almost 3%.
Exactly. Apples to Apples, the unemployment numbers are significantly worse than when Obama took office.
Waiting from Zod to come in and try to tell us how much better the economy is now than before.
First the author of the article bashing Romney's tax plan came out and said that the Dems are totally misquoting his study....now massive holes are shot into their jobs numbers.
The Dems are getting exposed for what they are.....empty suits whose entitlement/spend/socialistic polices do not work.
#72
Posted 10 October 2012 - 09:57 AM
Anecdotal evidence and hearsay, so take it as you will.
#74
Posted 10 October 2012 - 10:03 AM
http://www.nytimes.c...l?smid=fb-share
#75
Posted 10 October 2012 - 10:19 AM
Is % of American population really a fair comparison? The fastest growing segment of the U.S. population is people over 65. Retirement takes many of them out of the workforce. This segment has grown by more than 15% since 2000 and the rate of growth is increasing more rapidly now.Found this interesting
If the same % of americans were participating in labor force (either holding a job, or attempting to find a job) as when Obama took office, the unemployment rate would be 10.7%.
So for those of you balking about all of the people who have given up not being counted, that effect on the rate is almost 3%.
Maybe the study accounts for that, I don't know. If it doesn't, then that is not really a fair representation either.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





