Greg Hardy
#1
Posted 06 October 2012 - 08:36 PM
#2
Posted 06 October 2012 - 08:45 PM
#3
Posted 06 October 2012 - 08:48 PM
#4
Posted 06 October 2012 - 08:52 PM
#5
Posted 06 October 2012 - 08:57 PM
#6
Posted 06 October 2012 - 09:08 PM
Theoretically you want to move him around for favorable matchups whether that is inside or out based on the opponent. Everything is about individual matchups and mismatches dictated by scheme and line adjustments.
#7
Posted 06 October 2012 - 09:10 PM
Moving Hardy inside with Dwan on third downs has worked so far. We have looked solid on third down rushing the passer.When we decide to apply pressure that is.
#8
Posted 06 October 2012 - 09:22 PM
Seems to me that we have to look at what packages we need to run this week based on the opponents tendencies rather than generalities. Do we need to rush the quarterback as we did against Atlanta or defend the run first and pass secondarily. Then the question is whether or not Hardy is best inside or out.
Theoretically you want to move him around for favorable matchups whether that is inside or out based on the opponent. Everything is about individual matchups and mismatches dictated by scheme and line adjustments.
I hear where you are coming from. It does make sense to move players around and look for mismatches. Depending on what you are trying to do defensively.
But on obvious passing downs, so far as I have seen, Dwan and Hardy inside has been pretty effective. I have even seen Fua and Hardy apply pressure.
I agree that it seems like the run D has not quite figured out what they are trying to do. No lane integrity, over running plays, bad angles, and missed tackles seem to be the issues in the run D. Until these are cleaned up, we will probably continue to struggle stopping the run.
This is the week our run D needs to show up big time. Stop Lynch and we should win. It really is that simple this week.
#9
Posted 06 October 2012 - 09:25 PM
Seems to me that we have to look at what packages we need to run this week based on the opponents tendencies rather than generalities. Do we need to rush the quarterback as we did against Atlanta or defend the run first and pass secondarily. Then the question is whether or not Hardy is best inside or out.
Theoretically you want to move him around for favorable matchups whether that is inside or out based on the opponent. Everything is about individual matchups and mismatches dictated by scheme and line adjustments.
I think that is where Carolina needs to explore more in the future. Instead of set schemes, mismatches by personal change could affect the game. This coming game will definitely be more run focused but at the same time I think trying to find DL favorable match ups will be critical.
#10
Posted 06 October 2012 - 09:28 PM
Seems to me that we have to look at what packages we need to run this week based on the opponents tendencies rather than generalities. Do we need to rush the quarterback as we did against Atlanta or defend the run first and pass secondarily. Then the question is whether or not Hardy is best inside or out.
Theoretically you want to move him around for favorable matchups whether that is inside or out based on the opponent. Everything is about individual matchups and mismatches dictated by scheme and line adjustments.
i.e., nascar package
#11
Posted 06 October 2012 - 09:36 PM
I think that is where Carolina needs to explore more in the future. Instead of set schemes, mismatches by personal change could affect the game. This coming game will definitely be more run focused but at the same time I think trying to find DL favorable match ups will be critical.
We do try and move people around on the D-line. You never know who is going to line up where? And I feel it is because Rivera is STILL trying to figure out who can do what? And that is starting to get me more than a little concerned.
Is Rivera not happy with what he has? Or is he just tinkering? Either way, it seems counter intuitive to me. Put players in a position to succeed, give them some confidence, then play with the alignments. I just think he is doing some weird things.
Or, it just could be I have no clue. I would hate to think I am clueless, so I am going to question Rivera. Makes me feel better, even if I am still confused.
#12
Posted 06 October 2012 - 09:45 PM
#13
Posted 06 October 2012 - 09:46 PM
#14
Posted 06 October 2012 - 10:20 PM
I think that having different packages for different situations is a great idea. You need guys who can play several positions instead of just one to have flexibility when injury hit s as it always does.We do try and move people around on the D-line. You never know who is going to line up where? And I feel it is because Rivera is STILL trying to figure out who can do what? And that is starting to get me more than a little concerned.
Is Rivera not happy with what he has? Or is he just tinkering? Either way, it seems counter intuitive to me. Put players in a position to succeed, give them some confidence, then play with the alignments. I just think he is doing some weird things.
Or, it just could be I have no clue. I would hate to think I am clueless, so I am going to question Rivera. Makes me feel better, even if I am still confused.
#15
Posted 06 October 2012 - 10:32 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





