Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

davos

Romney on Syria

15 posts in this topic

Thing you do in this situation...

You see Turks and Arabs are on a verge of attacking Syria while Iran backing Syria. You encourage Turks and Arabs to push on Syria and Iran and then slowly back away. This will start internal conflict between Muslims... you just sit back and watch.

You start war with Syria, muslims will see US as a bully again and will unite against US. Right now Hamas and Hezbollah are on a verge of a war... why the fug would anyone intervene between 2 terrorist organizations that about to destroy each other? If we truly fighting terrorism in middle east, that's the time to just sit back and watch.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing you do in this situation...

You see Turks and Arabs are on a verge of attacking Syria while Iran backing Syria. You encourage Turks and Arabs to push on Syria and Iran and then slowly back away. This will start internal conflict between Muslims... you just sit back and watch.

You start war with Syria, muslims will see US as a bully again and will united against US. Right now Hamas and Hezbollah are on a verge of a war... why the fug would anyone intervene between 2 terrorist organizations that about to destroy each other? If we truly fighting terrorism in middle east, that's the time to just sit back and watch.

SHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

(Dude! Don't suggest things that make sense! You'll jinx it!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Provide some support to the rebels, and offer to recognize them immediately should they take control of the government. Maybe we should provide arms, but I would need a lot more information about the rebels before making a decision on that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

same. i wouldnt go to war in that country regardless of the atrocities happening.

if we did we should also go to africa where most of that continent is a wasteland of genocide.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think Romney suggested supplying arms through Saudis, not directly.

Probably a good idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think Romney suggested supplying arms through Saudis, not directly.

Probably a good idea.

If you announce to the world that you will, ‘‘ensure they obtain the arms they need to defeat Assad’s tanks, helicopters and fighter jets" then I dont think giving the arms directly or indirectly makes any difference

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about think to yourself "Hmm, that sucks for Syria."

Then you bring home the troops, cut the bloated defense budget and spend the tax money on infrastructure and education.

n/m, that's crazy.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not inclined to support an imperialistic doctrine. However, I was given pause to consider the observations by the early W Bush cabinet that we cannot abide a nation state that sponsors terrorism against US citizens. If we have proof of that, we are well within our rights to defend ourselves.

On the other hand, to adopt a policy of forwarding nations' revolutions to suit our own economical and political interests is inherently antithetical to the founders' mandates for the federal government. I believe their wisdom on the matter to be as prudent now as it was then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would these be the same founders that accepted military assistance that France sent? The purpose of that assistance was to weaken the British empire and further french political and economic interest. If that actually was a belief or purpose of the founders, then it was extremely hypocritical of them.

Not that I buy that all the founders were of a single mind concerning various beliefs and goals that are attributed to them nowadays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Steve Beuerlein's pointing about not holding on to the ball so long was interesting to me. Some of you who remember when Beuerlein was here will remember that he took a straight beating in '99 and '00 and he also had a tendency to hold onto the ball for too long. It might be smart for Cam to listen to someone who had 21 surgeries from football injuries because of this. I love me some Cam and I want to see him as the starting QB for the Panthers for a long time to come.
    • As an LSU fan, I've seen nearly all of Fournette's games and he is the real deal. He was the best running back on the team. It does not take a genius to run the read option running attack and most of the work is on the Qb. I wouldn't mind either but Fournette should be taken if he's available.      My pipedream is for us to trade next year's 1st and both 2's for us to get a Fournette and Howard combo. I think it would be worth it.
    • I'm surprised that people actually buy into this idea that our offense is going to look drastically different. I'd be shocked if it does. I hope I'm wrong, but a leopard doesn't change it's spots. If Shula had the ability to adapt he would've already done it. He is who he is and this offense is what it is. If you want real changes you make a change at OC. We didn't and we'll see an offense that looks far more familiar than different next season.