Jump to content
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

g5jamz

Obama attended wedding of VP debate moderator

Recommended Posts

reportedly he didn't hook up with any bridesmaids either, he must be teh ghey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


The problem is that this is someone with a direct personal tie to Obama. Why didn't ABC put up Jake Tapper rather than her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rumor is that Romney will be in the same building as the debate moderator at the upcoming debate. That's a direct personal tie, how can we allow this to happen?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rumor is that Romney will be in the same building as the debate moderator for a debate he isnt ACTUALLY a participant in 22 years. That's a direct personal tie, how can we allow this to happen?

/fify

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh...... My...... God.... thats so super crazy.... 1991? thats such a connection... I heard that Romney shared sperm with Jim Lehrer... that MUST be why he won the debate. Give me a break, people will find anything to make news. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's not news, but people desperately want it to be, so the fact that it's not is proof positive that the media is in the tank for obomber

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's not news, but people desperately want it to be, so the fact that it's not is proof positive that the media is in the tank for obomber

I am still wondering why the media has not reported that the ad being run by Obama citing the one study to support that Romney's tax plan will creSt trillions on deficits is a complete farce. The professor and author if the report stated that he had absolutely no idea how they could get that from his study.

Either the Obama admin are plain liars, or his staff is too dense to actually understand the report or its claims...I am getting it is both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the point of a biased debate moderator? I guess I could see it affecting something if the candidates actually answered the questions they were asked, but thats more of a "cross that bridge when you get to it" situation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still wondering why the media has not reported that the ad being run by Obama citing the one study to support that Romney's tax plan will creSt trillions on deficits is a complete farce. The professor and author if the report stated that he had absolutely no idea how they could get that from his study.

Either the Obama admin are plain liars, or his staff is too dense to actually understand the report or its claims...I am getting it is both.

the media does not include punditry and specific examinations in its reports on candidates. that's not its job. its job is to provide raw, unbiased data.

if a fact-checking organization came out and made a splash by pointing out inaccuracies in campaign promises, you would expect to see them report it regardless of candidate. but the presentation would not be "romney tells blatant lies about taxes." it would be "a PAC for the president has come out publicly chastising romney for what they say is a patently false claim."

do you see what i'm getting at? (i'm not arguing about the legitimacy of the ad you're talking about, rather illustrating the media/story dynamic.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the media does not include punditry and specific examinations in its reports on candidates. that's not its job. its job is to provide raw, unbiased data.

if a fact-checking organization came out and made a splash by pointing out inaccuracies in campaign promises, you would expect to see them report it regardless of candidate. but the presentation would not be "romney tells blatant lies about taxes." it would be "a PAC for the president has come out publicly chastising romney for what they say is a patently false claim."

do you see what i'm getting at? (i'm not arguing about the legitimacy of the ad you're talking about, rather illustrating the media/story dynamic.)

It wasn't a fact checking group. It was the actual professor and author of the report who stated that their claim is inaccurate, baseless, and downright wrong.

If that had been a repub who made that statement, I guarantee you the media would be on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't a fact checking group. It was the actual professor and author of the report who stated that their claim is inaccurate, baseless, and downright wrong.

If that had been a repub who made that statement, I guarantee you the media would be on it.

do you have any links to your sources of information?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

do you have any links to your sources of information?

Posted the article quoting the professor in another thread. Don't have the link on my iPhone.

Article was written by John Hinderaker quoting Professir Rosen from Princeton....the author if the study they "claim" supports their assertions,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same thing happened for the last VP debate. The moderator was actually writing a book on Obama.

Roles are reversed this time. Everyone figured Biden would wipe the floor with Palin last time, and for the most part she avoided a knockout blow. Now people expect Ryan to make Biden look silly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      19,330
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    Egate
    Joined
  • Topics

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      140,772
    • Total Posts
      4,483,900
×