Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

jtnc

Likely a torn labrum for Gamble

108 posts in this topic

If he doesn't play with it, let's change the thread to say "labia."

Thank you.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You couldn't even complain on a message board if you had a torn labrum. Why make judgements about something you have no understanding of?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You couldn't even complain on a message board if you had a torn labrum. Why make judgements about something you have no understanding of?

What?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What?

Are you illiterate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You couldn't even complain on a message board if you had a torn labrum. Why make judgements about something you have no understanding of?

I'm pretty sure I could...

But even if I couldn't, Ed Reed certainly could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the thread where we suggest getting ride of all our talent, so the bitching can be justified?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you illiterate?

No, just didn't make sense to me. The implication was that you can't type with a torn labrum, when you can. Granted, only comfortably if done one-handed. However, I know from experience, if you know how to do it, you can type two-handed, it just hurts like hell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tore my labia once. Sucked big time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we sure it wasn't a torn labia?

Edit:

Damnit, joke isn't as funny whenever it's already been said...multiple times.

Thought I would be first...FML.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the culture of losing has taken over

so many things wrong with this franchise and its spread like a fuging cancer

UGH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Of course, he's so massive he has his own gravitational pull. 
    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,243
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    GSO Goat
    Joined