Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Actually intelligent analysis of Newton's year (not psychobabble bullpoo)


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
16 replies to this topic

#16 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 26 October 2012 - 11:10 AM

Disagree on the dink and dunk. Newton is a way better longball thrower than short touch passer, and that turns your offense into a horizontal attack if you don't have great YAC receivers (and other than Smith, we don't).


He needs a Newton version of a dink and dunk....which is why the 2 TE sets were great. Mid level throws.

#17 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 47,580
  • Reputation: 15,258
SUPPORTER

Posted 26 October 2012 - 11:14 AM

He needs a Newton version of a dink and dunk....which is why the 2 TE sets were great. Mid level throws.


That I could get behind.

Throw in a stronger rushing attack to help in the red zone and you've got a deal.