Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

DeAngelo Williams Trade Talks

trade

  • Please log in to reply
68 replies to this topic

#41 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 17,030
  • Reputation: 5,232
Moderators

Posted 29 October 2012 - 12:30 PM

Jared Cook from the Titans just asked for a trade as well. We could use a legit TE, and he has the frame to block as well - not familiar with how well he does that as of now though.

Doubt they'd want to trade for a RB but could be something to consider otherwise.

#42 beastson

beastson

    Philly Cheese Steak

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,724
  • Reputation: 1,833
HUDDLER

Posted 29 October 2012 - 12:33 PM

Dallas not trading for no D.Will

We want D.Will gone cause of the contract, we have 2-3 other backs, and we have other issues to fix

#43 Dingo_ate_Babies

Dingo_ate_Babies

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 569
  • Reputation: 29
HUDDLER

Posted 29 October 2012 - 12:36 PM

Dallas not trading for no D.Will


Says who? You?

Trade makes sense on both sides.

#44 nosuchthingasapanther

nosuchthingasapanther

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 5,770
  • Reputation: 2,308
SUPPORTER

Posted 29 October 2012 - 12:38 PM

It's only a bad contract because they aren't using him. I mean, prior to yesterday's game, the guy had 8 carries combined in the previous two. When you give these guys touches, they will produce. The talent on this team isn't as bad as panther fans make it out. The problem is the coaching. And the biggest weakness right now is the offensive line IMO. I just don't think trading one of your best offensive weapons is the right move to make the team any better. They need to be using him more, and changing the offense is a step in the right direction.


cam newton is the center of the offense, not the running backs. there simply isn't enough of a workload to warrant having 2 high priced running backs.

now if john fox was still head coach...

#45 philw5289

philw5289

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-January 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,572
  • Reputation: 547
HUDDLER

Posted 29 October 2012 - 12:41 PM

if anyone does i would say green bay

#46 davos

davos

    €∞€∞€∞€

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,488
  • Reputation: 1,929
  • LocationCO
HUDDLER

Posted 29 October 2012 - 12:43 PM

I'm hearing rumblings there are rumblings

#47 Jacket60

Jacket60

    Member

  • Joined: 11-September 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 110
  • Reputation: 26
HUDDLER

Posted 29 October 2012 - 12:43 PM

i think most of us in here have figured that out.


Right, so why does everyone want to get rid of talent we already have. If anything needs changing, it's the coaching staff.

#48 Jacket60

Jacket60

    Member

  • Joined: 11-September 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 110
  • Reputation: 26
HUDDLER

Posted 29 October 2012 - 12:45 PM

cam newton is the center of the offense, not the running backs. there simply isn't enough of a workload to warrant having 2 high priced running backs.

now if john fox was still head coach...


Cam doesn't have to be the center though. Why can't there be a balance? And yesterday's game indicates that the running backs are starting to get a bigger workload.

#49 CBDellinger

CBDellinger

    CAMdamonium!

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 833
  • Reputation: 191
  • LocationCharlotte, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 29 October 2012 - 12:46 PM

Right, so why does everyone want to get rid of talent we already have. If anything needs changing, it's the coaching staff.



cUz we d0n't wanna b hamstrung by his sh1ta$$ c0ntract 4evah and evah!!

#50 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,898
  • Reputation: 7,795
Moderators

Posted 29 October 2012 - 12:47 PM

Right, so why does everyone want to get rid of talent we already have. If anything needs changing, it's the coaching staff.

because 1) we are locked into some incredibly ugly contracts with players that are good, but not worth the money we have committed to them which leads to 2) we have definite holes and a lack of vet experience and leadership that is much needed in the lockerroom and on the field and our ability to address those holes is compromised because of those contracts.

we need more talent and more experience AND we need better coaching.

it's not one or the other.



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: trade

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users