Actually he isn't....if you hold a team to 200 yards, have 6 sacks and generate 3 turnovers....you SHOULD win. The fact the Bears had the ball to make that last drive is an embarrassment to the STs and Offense of Carolina.....game should of been won much earlier. Only against Carolina would an opponent have an opportunity to win that gameHoly poo. I can't believe he actually said that. He truly is completely and utterly clueless.
McDumbnutz Comments on Loss to Bears
#16
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:25 PM
#17
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:27 PM
COACHING.
STAFF.
EVARRRRRRR.
#18
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:27 PM
The Bears scoring drives before the FG:
1. 49 yards, mostly Forte
2. 38 yards
They really never beat the defense until they played completely off. I'm sure Rivera has say in that coverage.
#19
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:27 PM
What Ron Rivera said was even more mind boggling.
So Ron Rivera is putting the horrible playcalling on the players again? Why not adjust? Why not instruct McDumnutz to call plays with tighter coverages? Man I can't stand this crap that we call HC and DC..
So McD should of held them to 100 yards....and had more sacks and turnovers?
D did their part to whoop the Bears. McD is right.....even though he should of kept his mouth shut
#20
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:28 PM
Holy poo. I can't believe he actually said that. He truly is completely and utterly clueless.
#21
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:29 PM
Based on our defensive play, McDermott is actually a bright spot on our coaching staff. He should keep his head down and let everyone else get guillotined.
#22
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:29 PM
At the end of the day, they let Hester ultimately beat them. Field position is what prevented Chicago from being murdered.....bc the D did their part for a butt stomping to of occured.
McD is right, you don't lose games in the NFL when your D does what his did.....
#23
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:36 PM
#24
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:39 PM
While you may or may not like the staff there is one thing that is certain. They have all been working, playing, and living the sport most of their lives. They have all been employed at the highest level attainable. They know more about football than any single one of you knows about anything.
They also may or may not have suffered countless concussions and other forms of traumatic brain damage. +1 me.
#25
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:46 PM
Actually he isn't....if you hold a team to 200 yards, have 6 sacks and generate 3 turnovers....you SHOULD win. The fact the Bears had the ball to make that last drive is an embarrassment to the STs and Offense of Carolina.....game should of been won much earlier. Only against Carolina would an opponent have an opportunity to win that game
When his defense took the field who was winning? O ok. How many drives started with terribble field position because the staff allowed the bears to start from the 40? O ok. It's a team game. Defense has its job to do so does the offense and special teams. The defense and offense played well the defense were just the last ones stuck with picking up the bill and their check bounced.
#26
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:55 PM
#27
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:56 PM
#28
Posted 30 October 2012 - 01:27 PM
The secondary all remembered very well the fiasco in Atlanta. None of them wanted to be the poster boy for the big play, so they played softer than they should have, not recognizing the difference in the situation.
So if you're the head coach, you need to call a timeout after the 1st or 2nd slant, get the guys together, and remind them of how few yards the O needed to travel to win the game, telling them to tighten up their coverages. This is a very young secondary, especially in the case of Norman and Thomas, and they need to be coached. You don't just sit back and watch them fail, which is what RR and staff decided to do.
#30
Posted 30 October 2012 - 02:53 PM
Actually he isn't....if you hold a team to 200 yards, have 6 sacks and generate 3 turnovers....you SHOULD win. The fact the Bears had the ball to make that last drive is an embarrassment to the STs and Offense of Carolina.....game should of been won much earlier. Only against Carolina would an opponent have an opportunity to win that game
Should've, could've, wasn't. We played the same soft zone bullshit the entire 4th quarter and they killed us with the same quick slants all 4th quarter. Why go away from what got you in a position to potentially win the game? The biggest reason why our pass rush was rendered ineffective was because those same quick slants were wide ass open every time. The ball was gone as soon as Cutler completed his drop.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






