Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CatofWar

SCOTUS: Drug Dogs Used Outside Your Home

65 posts in this topic

Some of you people really need to wake up. I bet if the gov't set up mandatory door-to-door inspections on everyone of you guys would find some reason to justify it.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn drug dogs are trained to make everyone look guilty, haha. How is it that we've gotten to this point where dogs are put in positions of investigative authority...this concept is totally ridiculous.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There you go again......the man is just out to get innocent african americans.

This is getting old.

You're the one that makes that leap. All I said was that I had seen it happen in a black neighborhood. Two in fact; one in Statesville and one in Lenoir. I would assume that the same would be done in a poor white neighborhood, if deemed as a drug area.

It's not my fault that you assume all poor black people are guilty.

Here's another example, although I'm sure most of you will pass it off as permissible. Watauga High School, and in fact most high schools with their own regional PD, partners up with the Boone PD to do random sweeps of their student parking lots and locker areas with Dogs. A few students every year are charged with charges ranging from gun to drug possession and subsequently suspended or expelled from school.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Snowball affect.

I am so tired of the federal/state/local government pushing the limits of the law.

Wait until they can pull you over in a car for a safety inspection, like they do boats now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn drug dogs are trained to make everyone look guilty, haha. How is it that we've gotten to this point where dogs are put in positions of investigative authority...this concept is totally ridiculous.

The problem with drug dogs is that there is always a person who has to be there to "interpret" a dog's actions. I had a friend who was pulled over by the cops after running a red. Obviously, the officer smelled weed and brought a dog to search the car.

Nothing wrong so far obviously, but then one of the guys in the car had a backpack with him, and the cop decided he wanted to search it. He put the bag on the street, led the dog over to it. Dog turned away (there wasnt any weed in the bag obviously), but the cop wasnt done. Led the dog back to the bag, patted it. Dog turned away again. Cop doesnt take no for an answer, points the dog at the bag once more, dog pauses and gives it a sniff, turns back to the car.

Officer decides at that point that the dog "marked" the backpack, so he opens it up and finds a 5th of vodka, no weed. The kid gets an underage alcohol charge. He was white btw (not that it matters)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are you trying to turn his point into a race thing?

Floppin was the one who brought up the black neighborhoods and what they were already doing....not me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Floppin was the one who brought up the black neighborhoods and what they were already doing....not me.

Yea and? "Black neighborhoods" served as a descriptor to the point he was making...then you come along taking it to the next level with your nonsensical comments about "the man" who is out to get "innocent black people," with a hint of sarcasm inferring that theyre not innocent and are getting what they deserve.

I'm not one to point fingers or help prop-up the continuous perpetuation of race baiting and division...however, i'm sure there are many out there who would consider your comments to be a wee bit racist in You should consider thinking before you type.

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. A dead on accurate post by venom. Please go back to posting about aliens or government cover ups man. You're making me nervous

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea and? "Black neighborhoods" served as a descriptor to the point he was making...then you come along taking it to the next level with your nonsensical comments about "the man" who is out to get "innocent black people," with a hint of sarcasm inferring that theyre not innocent and are getting what they deserve.

I'm not one to point fingers or help prop-up the continuous perpetuation of race baiting and division...however, i'm sure there are many out there who would consider your comments to be a wee bit racist in You should consider thinking before you type.

That is bullshit and you know it.

He could have easily said that they were walking though neighborhoods if that was his point. He made it a point to say black neighborhoods to make yet another statement on how these actions/laws are designed for the specific intent of screwing minorities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is bullshit and you know it.

He could have easily said that they were walking though neighborhoods if that was his point. He made it a point to say black neighborhoods to make yet another statement on how these actions/laws are designed for the specific intent of screwing minorities.

MH you don't KNOW he mentioned it was a black neighborhood to make any such statement. All we KNOW is he posted it was a black neighborhood.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites