Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

"Serious" chance D-Will gets traded

140 posts in this topic

Posted

Trades not going to happen. No way the FO eats the money for a low round pick.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Thanks!! So in essence we would be paying $9.6 mill in dead money next season but then be freed of his contract? If so, that sounds good to me since we're not using him at all.

Here's the thing about that. Williams' and everyone else's contract that runs past this year, that next year's bonus proration is already counting for 2013. Stay, go. Cut, trade. It's going to be there.

So, that leaves 2 years of bonus left to account for (2014, 2015), at $3.2 million/year ($6.4 million total) that accelerates versus $4.75 million salary and $ 250k bonus (total $4.9 million). So really, the two options leave you $1.4 million less space for dumping him than keeping him, which is not that big a deal if you want to drop him.

The thing that's odd is that they've supposedly decided they just don't want him anymore, or that he and Hurney were so tied that he immediately needed demoted or traded ASAP. That part's odd. He's the more rational guy to cut, but the idea he has to just immediately GTFO is weird. I guess it's inevitable, but it's very sudden.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The thing that's odd is that they've supposedly decided they just don't want him anymore, or that he and Hurney were so tied that he immediately needed demoted or traded ASAP. That part's odd. He's the more rational guy to cut, but the idea he has to just immediately GTFO is weird.

it's not hard to figure out. the intent was not to get rid of him right now.

williams got demoted and everyone overreacted. naturally, he's not going to be happy about it. other teams know it and are considering throwing hooks in the water to see what bites.

contrary to popular rumors, the panthers are not going to just let williams go at the first sign of an offer. they want to dump his contract, but it's going to be one on of 3 conditions...

1. a team ponies up a can't refuse offer by the trade deadline

2. he restructures, or...

3. he gets cut after june 1st 2013.

GM or no GM, this is how it will go down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Here's the thing about that. Williams' and everyone else's contract that runs past this year, that next year's bonus proration is already counting for 2013. Stay, go. Cut, trade. It's going to be there.

So, that leaves 2 years of bonus left to account for (2014, 2015), at $3.2 million/year ($6.4 million total) that accelerates versus $4.65 million salary and $ 250k bonus (total $4.9 million). So really, the two options leave you $1.5 million less space for dumping him than keeping him, which is not that big a deal if you want to drop him.

The thing that's odd is that they've supposedly decided they just don't want him anymore, or that he and Hurney were so tied that he immediately needed demoted or traded ASAP. That part's odd. He's the more rational guy to cut, but the idea he has to just immediately GTFO is weird.

Every time I feel I get a grasp of a contract something new pops up. I definitely think his situation is a weird one. I don't know why he fell out of flavor from one week to another. If we don't make out like bandits on a trade offer with him, we might as well keep him.

The new GM should sit with him in the offseason and discuss 2 options:

1. Restructure and stay with the team as a starter/backup in a power run offense where he was successful.

2. Restructure and we'll trade him to a team that will have quality carries for him. Restructuring helps us in the future and will allow a trade to go smoother.

DWill doesn't seem like a selfish player/person and he got his payday. I think he would accept one of the above options if the deal is fair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Here's the thing about that. Williams' and everyone else's contract that runs past this year, that next year's bonus proration is already counting for 2013. Stay, go. Cut, trade. It's going to be there.

So, that leaves 2 years of bonus left to account for (2014, 2015), at $3.2 million/year ($6.4 million total) that accelerates versus $4.65 million salary and $ 250k bonus (total $4.9 million). So really, the two options leave you $1.5 million less space for dumping him than keeping him, which is not that big a deal if you want to drop him.

The thing that's odd is that they've supposedly decided they just don't want him anymore, or that he and Hurney were so tied that he immediately needed demoted or traded ASAP. That part's odd. He's the more rational guy to cut, but the idea he has to just immediately GTFO is weird.

I had posted earlier that if he were traded immediately, the $9.6 million would hit in 2012. From your post and other readings, I now see that I was incorrect. The $9.6 hits in 2013 as you correctly point out.

Let's say they don't trade him tomorrow. As I understand it, we could cut him as early as the start of the league year in March, designate him a June 1st cut, and split the acceleration into two years ($3.2 million in 2013, and $6.4 million in 2014). As his salary next year would be $4, 750,000, we could generate some cap savings for next year should he be cut. The net impact in 2014 would be about $700,000 negative based on the info I have.

Does all this look correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Every time I feel I get a grasp of a contract something new pops up. I definitely think his situation is a weird one. I don't know why he fell out of flavor from one week to another. If we don't make out like bandits on a trade offer with him, we might as well keep him.

The new GM should sit with him in the offseason and discuss 2 options:

1. Restructure and stay with the team as a starter/backup in a power run offense where he was successful.

2. Restructure and we'll trade him to a team that will have quality carries for him. Restructuring helps us in the future and will allow a trade to go smoother.

DWill doesn't seem like a selfish player/person and he got his payday. I think he would accept one of the above options if the deal is fair.

yeah. I'm not saying it's completely out of bounds to say, "this team has one high paid back, we'll deal with this eventually." It's just weird that Hurney's gone, and suddenly DW is an afterthought.

Ideally I'd prefer a GM to do this, and have that as part of his own plan. For now, the worry is that if he's not dealt now, there won't be a market for him in the future, and the same numbers will come without a pick at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I say trade him, he is not his old self, getting tired of seeing him being stuffed in the backfield.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I had posted earlier that if he were traded immediately, the $9.6 million would hit in 2012. From your post and other readings, I now see that I was incorrect. The $9.6 hits in 2013 as you correctly point out.

Let's say they don't trade him tomorrow. As I understand it, we could cut him as early as the start of the league year in March, designate him a June 1st cut, and split the acceleration into two years ($3.2 million in 2013, and $6.4 million in 2014). As his salary next year would be $4, 750,000, we could generate some cap savings for next year should he be cut. The net impact in 2014 would be about $700,000 negative based on the info I have.

Does all this look correct?

yeah, they could do that (push '14 and '15's signing bonus proration into '14).

His total hit for '13 would be the $3.2 mil that's going to count regardless, and no salary (savings $5 mil), '14 would carry the total $6.4 mil left. (I have him down for $5.75 mil + 250K bonus in 2014, all of it saved).

That's not an unreasonable way to do it - if you believe DW is one of the one or two must-cut players and that lightens the load a bit. IF the next GM really wants to slash and burn (part of me really hopes not), then it wouldn't cost that much to let him go all on next year and move a different contract or two back to '14.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

After today, I don't see a trade happening. Insert your favorite "coach speak" cliche as the reason why he wasn't dealt.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I say trade him, he is not his old self, getting tired of seeing him being stuffed in the backfield.

Yes because that has nothing to do with the sh*tty way the o-line is playing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'd rather just use him, properly.

Amen.

And HTF do you fall behind in the Depth Chart to a guy (Stewart) averaging 3.5 yards per carry?

That is a pathetic output for a RB who just himself signed a 5 year, 36.5 million total, 22.5 million guaranteed contract extension.

DWill's contract also has less guaranteed money than Stewarts, 21 million to 22.5.

The Panthers "brain thrust" at this point is little more than a wet fart.

Not p!ssed off enough yet about the Panthers running attack?

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/former-panther-mike-goodson-outperformed-deangelo-williams-jonathan-180800338--nfl.html

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Is this horse not dead enough?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites