Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

"Serious" chance D-Will gets traded


  • Please log in to reply
139 replies to this topic

#41 MHS831

MHS831

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 08-June 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,811
  • Reputation: 2,646
HUDDLER

Posted 31 October 2012 - 04:19 PM

OK, I need some help from the capologists on here. THe way i understand this is the Panthers would take a hit financially if they trade him. The team that gets him would only be into him for about $2.5 million this season. I think the bonus was front-loaded, which means that the trading partner would not be obligated to pay the bonus.

So we will have paid DW about $20 million for 23 games since inking his deal. The new team would have to address the salary part of his check for the next three years or so, which comes to about $15m. However, it is not guaranteed if he is cut.

Is that right?

#42 CPF4LIFE

CPF4LIFE

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,642
  • Reputation: 1,450
HUDDLER

Posted 31 October 2012 - 04:21 PM

I was talking about this with my friend today at work and he is a die hard Packers fan. He said he would be willing to give up a first for D Will................i almost choked on my spit.

#43 MHS831

MHS831

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 08-June 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,811
  • Reputation: 2,646
HUDDLER

Posted 31 October 2012 - 04:21 PM

Evan Silva quoting Adsm Schefter on twitter:

I still say DW goes to the Packers.


I am guessing the Cardinals.

#44 TruCatzFan

TruCatzFan

    Phil 4:13

  • Joined: 21-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,470
  • Reputation: 592
  • LocationAlaska
HUDDLER

Posted 31 October 2012 - 04:21 PM

You can throw all the stats you want to. The only numbers that matter are the contracts and the guys' respective ages. Go ask the folks that get paid to do this stuff for a living. I don't need to argue with you all. What's done will be done.


Yep I agree... That's why DeAngelo was taken care of before Stew was. If they thought DeAngelo was so damned expendable they would have traded him then and not after giving him such a big deal. Fact of the matter is he got overpaid, but not by much based off of what he was producing at the time on field. It's super easy to attack him now that he's not getting the touches and thereby not able to produce, but even with the minimal touches he's still doing well.

They will make moves to get some salary cap back... And I think it will be RE STRUCTURING deals, and maybe trading someone. People get too caught up n the latest media cycle and because most people are SHEEP they just automatically agree. It would make no sense to trade either one of our RB's

#45 Bj-Monster23

Bj-Monster23

    Slam Newton

  • Joined: 07-January 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,487
  • Reputation: 260
  • LocationRaleigh NC
HUDDLER

Posted 31 October 2012 - 04:22 PM

D Will contract needs to go, he isn't worth that much money and his contract clear up hella salary for the future. I don't think you guys really understand that if we can get a 3rd we make out like bandits in this deal.

#46 Dpantherman

Dpantherman

    certified pee-on

  • Joined: 17-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 26,478
  • Reputation: 558
HUDDLER

Posted 31 October 2012 - 04:23 PM

Yep I agree... That's why DeAngelo was taken care of before Stew was. If they thought DeAngelo was so damned expendable they would have traded him then and not after giving him such a big deal. Fact of the matter is he got overpaid, but not by much based off of what he was producing at the time on field. It's super easy to attack him now that he's not getting the touches and thereby not able to produce, but even with the minimal touches he's still doing well.

They will make moves to get some salary cap back... And I think it will be RE STRUCTURING deals, and maybe trading someone. People get too caught up n the latest media cycle and because most people are SHEEP they just automatically agree. It would make no sense to trade either one of our RB's


He was taken care of first because his contract ran out first genius.

#47 Montsta

Montsta

    Rest In Peace

  • Joined: 08-December 08
  • posts: 7,418
  • Reputation: 5,440
SUPPORTER

Posted 31 October 2012 - 04:23 PM

I was talking about this with my friend today at work and he is a die hard Packers fan. He said he would be willing to give up a first for D Will................i almost choked on my spit.


Tell him to shake on it and call the GB front office! Done deal!!

#48 Way Truth Life

Way Truth Life

    Member

  • Joined: 26-November 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 633
  • Reputation: 103
HUDDLER

Posted 31 October 2012 - 04:23 PM

I was talking about this with my friend today at work and he is a die hard Packers fan. He said he would be willing to give up a first for D Will................i almost choked on my spit.

Unless you guys work as NFL agents then this really doesn't mean poo.

#49 SmittyistheGOAT

SmittyistheGOAT

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 28-September 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 340
  • Reputation: 24
HUDDLER

Posted 31 October 2012 - 04:24 PM

If we get a 3rd or more for D-Will I will personally go down to Charlotte and give Mr. Beane a blumpkin.

#50 MHS831

MHS831

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 08-June 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,811
  • Reputation: 2,646
HUDDLER

Posted 31 October 2012 - 04:24 PM

I was talking about this with my friend today at work and he is a die hard Packers fan. He said he would be willing to give up a first for D Will................i almost choked on my spit.


I am curious what people are expecting. I would not be surprised if we get a player (like a RG) for him. If it is a pick, I am guessing a 3rd or 4th rounder. However, if there is a bidding war, then we could get something better.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users