Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Zod

Romney now supports FEMA

85 posts in this topic

That's what he said stripped of all context, sure. But he said it in response to a FEMA question. If someone asks you about FEMA and you say "we should give power to the states and/or privatize," you're saying you want to get rid of FEMA.

Nope ... that's only your interpretation of what he said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope ... that's only your interpretation of what he said.

Kinda like roads and bridges?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kinda like roads and bridges?

Not at all ... direct quote from Obama:

"Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen."

Show me a direct quote from Romney that says, "I want to dismantle FEMA" or anything remotely close to that. You can't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you didn't build "that" refers to infrastructure and anyone who isn't retarded makes that connection when given the full quote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you didn't build "that" refers to infrastructure and anyone who isn't retarded makes that connection when given the full quote.

WTF ... it says right in that same sentence "if you have a business .... you didn't build that." Now, I'd never call anyone "retarded" (thought that was a huge no-no for liberals), but if you can't read the entire sentence of less than 10 words and know what it means, then you have a terrible reading deficiency. It may not have been what he MEANT to say, but it is exactly what he DID say ... and I believe he meant it exactly the way he said it.

And, by the way ... if you have a business (or even if you don't) you certainly DID build "that" if "that refers to roads and bridges ... because we're all taxpayers who pay for that infrastructure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The following editorial appeared in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram on Thursday, Nov. 1:

Hurricane Katrina's direct hit on New Orleans in 2005 brought disaster in many ways: almost 1,800 lives lost, $108 billion in property damage and for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, a lingering reputation for failure.

In fact, it might have meant the end for the agency, which can trace its roots back more than 200 years. There's been talk in the long presidential selection process leading up to next Tuesday's election that FEMA might be a worthy target for elimination or privatization in the name of federal budget-cutting.

Hold on. FEMA, the dope of Katrina, may be turning into the hero of Superstorm Sandy.

In terms of lives affected, Sandy is bigger than Katrina. Millions of people live in the path of the superstorm, which moved onshore Monday in New Jersey. FEMA's success in its mission of coordinating federal relief efforts, assisting state and local emergency response teams and, as the name says, emergency management, was essential.

From all accounts so far, including praise from state and local officials across the disaster zone, the agency has met the challenge admirably.

Still, it's reasonable to ask whether FEMA is really necessary. Could states or private industry do the job?

No. There could be no better demonstration than Sandy that a well-run federal emergency response is crucial in a major disaster. If we didn't have FEMA, we'd need the same agency by another name.

At a time when all federal resources must be available to help, coordinated by full-time professionals in emergency management, with relief supplies at hand and ready for distribution, with expertise to help state and local response efforts in ways that have been worked out well ahead of time, FEMA or something like it is called for.

That didn't happen with Katrina. But FEMA obviously has been reshaped and given competent leadership since then. It appears to be working now.

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2012/11/02/3897615/fema-showing-it-can-do-a-good.html#storylink=cpy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask Staten Island how FEMA is working out for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

During one of the 2011 GOP presidential debates sponsored by CNN, Mitt Romney argued that the Federal Emergency Management Agency should be disbanded and replaced by handing over the responsibility to the states to deal with their own emergencies.

Here’s what the Republican candidate had to say when asked whether FEMA should be shut down:

“Absolutely. Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that’s the right direction. And if you can go even further, and send it back to the private sector, that’s even better. Instead of thinking, in the federal budget, what we should cut, we should ask the opposite question, what should we keep?”

When moderator, John King, responded “Including disaster relief, though?”, Mitt Romney had this to say—

“We cannot — we cannot afford to do those things without jeopardizing the future for our kids.It is simply immoral, in my view, for us to continue to rack up larger and larger debts and pass them on to our kids, knowing full well that we’ll all be dead and gone before it’s paid off. It makes no sense at all.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/10/29/romney-wants-to-disband-fema-do-you-think-n-j-governor-chris-christie-agrees-with-the-gop-today/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Spineless politicians who don't want to be blamed for the problems blame others and then when electrical workers get there, they are attacked.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/02/bridgeport-utility-workers-report-having-objects-thrown-at-them-by-residents/

I think Obama should on national TV tonight with his telethon and sing some Al Green for these folks. Then blame it on Bush, or better yet, appear with Kanye and blame Sandy and Katrina on Bush. That should help those folks who are cold and hungry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, looks like a great "global warming" advocate like Bloomberg would have been better prepared for the rising seas. Guess your beliefs only go so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites