Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

The impact of play action on our offense


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#1 Urrymonster

Urrymonster

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,264
  • Reputation: 39
HUDDLER

Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:08 PM

I've been digging around in www.profootballfocus.com a bit more to find out some intriguing nuggets of info. What is interesting is the impact of the play action on our passing game. While there is a form of play fake with the read option, i am unsure if they they are recording it as a play action play. Considering this they have recorded us as having performed 69 play action drop backs compared to 174 non play action drop backs, which is the third highest percentage in the NFL. What is more telling though is the impact with and without the play action.

With the play action Cam has achieved the following:
* 68.8% completion - 6th highest in the NFL
* 10.9 yards per attempt - 5th highest in the NFL
* 102.1 QB rating - 13th highest in the NFL
* 2 TDs to 2 Ints

Without the play action Cam has achieved the following:
* 52% completion - 32nd in the NFL (last)
* 6.8 yards per attempt - 17th in the NFL
* 63.6 QB rating - 32nd in the NFL (last)
* 3 TDs to 6 Ints

It's quite amazing to see Cam as one of the leagues best when he is using the play action, then fall to statistically the worst in the league when there is no play fake involved.

Across the entire data set yards and QB ratings are universally down, although some QBs clearly perform better without the play action (Aaron Rodgers for example). In contrast there isn't a huge disparity between accuracy percentages with 21 QBs above 60% for both the with and without the play action.

What does this mean for Cam and the Panthers? Well it is concerning to see quite how much Cam has struggled without any deception to pull players out of their coverages. Clearly he is having issues with either the increased pressure the normal drop backs are bringing or he is struggling to read the coverages and make the right choice with the ball. However it is equally concerning that our coaches aren't using more (traditional) play action plays to help him out. RGIII has an extra 20 drop backs over Cam. However it could suggest why much of the play calling is designed to create confusion in the defence because Cam is struggling mightily when he doesn't have that help. For Cam to be considered one of the best passer's in the league, it's the passing without play action which seems to separate the perennial post season QBs from the regular season stat padders.

Anyway, would be interesting to see other people's takes on this.


#2 Car123

Car123

    Newton's Law

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,177
  • Reputation: 637
HUDDLER

Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:17 PM

Imagine if we could run the ball better

#3 Urrymonster

Urrymonster

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,264
  • Reputation: 39
HUDDLER

Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:21 PM

Imagine if we could run the ball better


Indeed, play action would be very profitable for us. That said, Cam is already performing great out of play action so the lack of running game isn't impacting him. It's when teams know that we aren't running that he struggles mightily.

When we show the intent to run, Cam excels. In plays where there is no option of a run, bar Cam scrambling, then he is the worst in the league.

#4 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,796
Moderators

Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:22 PM

Imagine if we could run the ball better

we'd be running it better if we weren't running the read option so much. it's very easy to defend when you expect it and i don't care who you have running the ball.

fwiw, i just saw this:

PFF Random Saturday stat time. Alex Smith is completing 76.6% of his passes off play action. 49ers run game is huge right now


we aren't running an offense that works (at least we weren't until last week), instead, chud is running an offense that he likes. that's a dangerous decision to make.

#5 Urrymonster

Urrymonster

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,264
  • Reputation: 39
HUDDLER

Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:26 PM

we'd be running it more if we weren't running the read option so much. it's very easy to defend when you expect it and i don't care who you have running the ball.

fwiw, i just saw this:


we aren't running an offense that works (at least we weren't until last week), instead, chud is running an offense that he likes. that's a dangerous decision to make.


Our run game isn't impacting our success in the passing game though. Even though our running game is struggling, Cam is performing really well when we use play action. The issue is when he is doing any other kind of passing play where there is no threat of a run. At the moment he just can't make throws against a defence ready to defend him passing it.

#6 TonyN

TonyN

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 26-October 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 700
  • Reputation: 204
HUDDLER

Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:38 PM

I've been digging around in www.profootballfocus.com a bit more to find out some intriguing nuggets of info. What is interesting is the impact of the play action on our passing game. While there is a form of play fake with the read option, i am unsure if they they are recording it as a play action play. Considering this they have recorded us as having performed 69 play action drop backs compared to 174 non play action drop backs, which is the third highest percentage in the NFL. What is more telling though is the impact with and without the play action.

With the play action Cam has achieved the following:
* 68.8% completion - 6th highest in the NFL
* 10.9 yards per attempt - 5th highest in the NFL
* 102.1 QB rating - 13th highest in the NFL
* 2 TDs to 2 Ints

Without the play action Cam has achieved the following:
* 52% completion - 32nd in the NFL (last)
* 6.8 yards per attempt - 17th in the NFL
* 63.6 QB rating - 32nd in the NFL (last)
* 3 TDs to 6 Ints

It's quite amazing to see Cam as one of the leagues best when he is using the play action, then fall to statistically the worst in the league when there is no play fake involved.

Across the entire data set yards and QB ratings are universally down, although some QBs clearly perform better without the play action (Aaron Rodgers for example). In contrast there isn't a huge disparity between accuracy percentages with 21 QBs above 60% for both the with and without the play action.

What does this mean for Cam and the Panthers? Well it is concerning to see quite how much Cam has struggled without any deception to pull players out of their coverages. Clearly he is having issues with either the increased pressure the normal drop backs are bringing or he is struggling to read the coverages and make the right choice with the ball. However it is equally concerning that our coaches aren't using more (traditional) play action plays to help him out. RGIII has an extra 20 drop backs over Cam. However it could suggest why much of the play calling is designed to create confusion in the defence because Cam is struggling mightily when he doesn't have that help. For Cam to be considered one of the best passer's in the league, it's the passing without play action which seems to separate the perennial post season QBs from the regular season stat padders.

Anyway, would be interesting to see other people's takes on this.


Great posts and great research.

The obvious is very easy to see by observant people like yourself...

People who don't have a nut sack hanging in their face...

#7 Argus Plexus

Argus Plexus

    Super Kami Guru

  • Joined: 13-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,802
  • Reputation: 847
  • LocationCape Fear Area
HUDDLER

Posted 03 November 2012 - 03:53 PM

Lack of execution of the O-Line is probably the biggest problem of this team. We might as well not have one. Case in point: The LoS is a jailbreak every singe down, even when they only rush three. It's pathetic.

#8 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-June 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,677
  • Reputation: 1,122
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 03 November 2012 - 03:56 PM

I don't want to get on TonyN's bad side. But, there are a lot of factors that go into that stat.

What down is it? How many yards do you need? Are we in Max protect or just a 5 man line? What is the actual play called? Plus more that I don't care to think for.

Also, Cam is not known for his checkdowns. Which could raise his %. So just claiming Cam has trouble with non playaction passes is rather simplistic. It is just another way to look at Cam. Can be use against him, or Chud for that matter.

Strong running games make playaction more effective. Although, just the threat of a run does have an effect as well.

Or at least that is what I think I think. And GOOOOOO CATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

#9 magnus

magnus

    Eternal Gameface

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,389
  • Reputation: 158
HUDDLER

Posted 03 November 2012 - 04:00 PM

with an inconsistent (but not inherently bad) set of mechanics, part of it is that playaction might simply also create a discipline that isn't there on the average shotgun dropback.

Another thing to consider is that Cam's struggled on 3rd down, when a team's done a lot of preparation for down and distance, versus 1st/2nd, which is when you're more likely to go playaction. So a part of that is also a matter of circumstance, that a big play offense that doesn't consistently get first downs will have longer 3rd downs (and no playaction).

Third, it's not that massive a stretch that a QB that's not always accurate would succeed in a format that creates an open receiver or that gives an implied read (SS hesitates because of the fake creates the easy middle of field covered/middle of field open read).

#10 iamhubby1

iamhubby1

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-June 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,677
  • Reputation: 1,122
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 03 November 2012 - 04:05 PM

Lack of execution of the O-Line is probably the biggest problem of this team. We might as well not have one. Case in point: The LoS is a jailbreak every singe down, even when they only rush three. It's pathetic.



"We might as well not have one." This is one of the top ten derps of all time. Dude, you are hilarious.

"A complaint without a solution is just a bich." Robert Prior

We just played the #1 D in the league. Did you expect us to just dominate? Evidently the answer is yes. So I guess it was a bad question to ask you.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users