Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

AceBoogie

Why Cameron Newton must win Tomorrow

52 posts in this topic

Why do people keep calling him Cameron? I never hear people say Stevonne Smith, Jonathan Beason or Gregory Olsen. So wtf is this whole Cameron thing?

Just for the record in a press conference earlier this year I believe after the Giants loss Cam said. "Cameron Newton needs to play better" just used at a moment when all joking aside it's time to be serious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope Gregory Hardy, Joshua Norman, and Michael Tolbert all have big games as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Geoffrey Hangartner is listed as probable. He should play, right? Benjamin Hartsock is set for a breakout game. Hopefully Jeffrey Jansen's only action will be longsnapping XPs.

(waiting for someone to put Kenny Onatolu's real name in a post)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

call him Cam.

So this us what we have gotten to....arguing over whether to call him Cam or Cameron.

Dear God.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, ldont care as long as we win

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cosign OP statements 100% dumb to not think.this game ain't a personal battle against Newton & RGIII if we lose Cam's brand takes a hit n RGIII will be looked at as better

I think Cam steps it up I hope so but this will be a shootout

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully he plays to win games!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's our superstar everybody should understand where OP.coming from everybody thinks he's Vince Young 2.0 smh going to that from potentially the MJ /LeBron of the NFL like we heard last year fug that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like Al Davis said just win baby win.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Posts

    • From the ssa wiki part on its history: The Social Security law was very unpopular among many groups, especially farmers, who resented the additional taxes and feared they would never be made good. They lobbied hard for exclusion. Furthermore, the Treasury realized how difficult it would be to set up payroll deduction plans for farmers, for housekeepers who employed maids, and for nonprofit groups; therefore they were excluded. State employees were excluded for constitutional reasons (the federal government cannot tax state government). Federal employees were also excluded. Many textbooks, however, falsely indicate that the exclusions were the product of southern racial hostility toward blacks; there is no evidence of that in the record.[15] Other scholars have replicated and endorsed DeWitt's analysis, agreeing that the exclusions were made by policy experts on technical grounds and were not grounded on racial hostility. Rodems and Shaefer note in all other countries unemployment insurance programs "excluded domestic and agricultural workers when they were first implemented, a fact that the key New Deal policy makers were well aware of.   Interesting stuff. 
    • After eating clean for a while, I can't eat bojangles, way too much salt.
    • this is an old story that anti-progressive media is pushing. all that happened is she applied for a loan for the college, for which they're required to submit a list of their donations so the office knows that they're able to pay back the loans. she submitted the list but included bequeathmets on the donor list instead of as a separate list, assuming they counted as donations. that's it. that's the entire story. it's a minor paperwork error that comes with a small fine.