Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Obama to pick Sotomayor for Supreme Court

80 posts in this topic

Posted

National Review says she screws up a lot and disregards law in her opinions. Has been called down by Clinton appointees.

Looks like the president saw "latino" and "woman" and said "I'll take her"

It's only fair. That's how HE got elected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

wwwhhhhhhhaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh

ah-la ah-la ah-la

wwwwhhhhhaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh

National Review hates her? Cool!

I have grown to love that term "legislating from the bench". Translated into English, I believe it means "THEY WANT TO TAKE MY GUNS AND BABIES!!!" and that makes me laugh.

I have not been keeping track - here it is, almost June...are all the guns banned yet? Have the forced abortions started? If not that Obama must be a total slacker!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

At a 2001 UC Berkeley symposium marking the 40th anniversary of the first Latino names to the federal district court, Sotomayor said that the gender and ethnicity of judges do and should affect their judicial decision-making, Sotomayor said that the gender and ethnicity of judges do and SHOULD affect their judicial decision-making. "Our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging," she said. "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

She's AWESOME man! Let's break out the pom-poms for another amazing Obama move. Rah rah! It's not even June yet and we've got our very own SC justice in the mold of the 1 nutball that opposed today's Prop-8 ruling. Love to read that dissenting opinion, I'm sure it's chock-full of amazing constitutional law citations. Way to go Obama...you're just so freaking cool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

"Our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging," she said. "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

Why can "minorities" get away with saying stuff like this?

Shouldn't the letter of the law decide a judgement? Every fat liberal will now sue Taco Bell for making them fat and the law is on their side. Go get your chalupa and cinnamon twists while you still can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

National Review says she screws up a lot and disregards law in her opinions. Has been called down by Clinton appointees.

Looks like the president saw "latino" and "woman" and said "I'll take her"

the national review is a rothbardian rag who cares

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

She's AWESOME man! Let's break out the pom-poms for another amazing Obama move. Rah rah! It's not even June yet and we've got our very own SC justice in the mold of the 1 nutball that opposed today's Prop-8 ruling. Love to read that dissenting opinion, I'm sure it's chock-full of amazing constitutional law citations. Way to go Obama...you're just so freaking cool.

Anthing like how all the guys who wrote the Constitution allowing only white male landowners to vote were all white male landowners? You mean legislating like that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I just hope he didn't pick her based on looks... :puke:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Why can "minorities" get away with saying stuff like this?

Shouldn't the letter of the law decide a judgement? Every fat liberal will now sue Taco Bell for making them fat and the law is on their side. Go get your chalupa and cinnamon twists while you still can.

Flip the statement...imagine a white male saying the same thing with the appropriate racial portions reversed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Flip the statement...imagine a white male saying the same thing with the appropriate racial portions reversed.

they did, it was called the constitution

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I just hope he didn't pick her based on looks... :puke:

Yeah...she is a little rough around the edges. :yesnod:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Anthing like how all the guys who wrote the Constitution allowing only white male landowners to vote were all white male landowners? You mean legislating like that?

That has absolutely NOTHING to do with court decisions today. Your statement is spoken like a true Obama-bowler.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

That has absolutely NOTHING to do with court decisions today. Your statement is spoken like a true Obama-bowler.

yes the constitution has nothing to do with decisions today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites