Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

JakeFlake

Obama to pick Sotomayor for Supreme Court

80 posts in this topic

I thought that was a womens clothing store

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

considering american law is based off a constitution and a bill of rights written over 250 years ago, I think that yes the demographics and professions (white, male, slaveowners) of the writers have a lot of bearing actually on the laws and decisions today.

unless of course you believe that this small, unrepresentative group of elites with the equivalent of modern day middle school educations somehow managed to come up with a set of pure, egalitarian laws that absolutely transcend gender, racial, and economic inequality more than two centuries later.

in that case i would encourage you to study for your upcoming test in 8th grade civ

Sotomayor isn't TALKING about the white male slaveowners that wrote the Constitution you stupid farking nitwit. It's just a strawman that you and CWG have contrived to again make people that look at a statement like that and see blatant racism, but you somehow turn it around and attempt to make US the racists. Stick to cruising bars Fiz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sotomayor isn't TALKING about the white male slaveowners that wrote the Constitution you stupid farking nitwit. t's just a strawman that you and CWG have contrived to again make people that look at a statement like that and see blatant racism, but you somehow turn it around and attempt to make US the racists. Stick to cruising bars Fiz.

i haven't said a thing about what sotomayor said.

i was simply pointing out your attempt to flip it around and play victim showed how unbelievably ignorant you are about the legal history of your own country.

believe me, I yearn for the day I can interact with you and not have to remind you how blindingly stupid you are, but I feel it is my duty, nay privilege, to berate you into educating yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i haven't said a thing about what sotomayor said.

i was simply pointing out your attempt to flip it around and play victim showed how unbelievably ignorant you are about the legal history of your own country.

believe me, I yearn for the day I can interact with you and not have to remind you how blindingly stupid you are, but I feel it is my duty, nay privilege, to berate you into educating yourself.

All I've talked about is what Sotomayer has said...CWG was the one introducing the strawman with you joining in with some tobacco sticks of your own to help prop it up.

Keep yearning Fiz...you've still got a lot of life experience and growing up to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All I've talked about is what Sotomayer has said...

of course, when you said this

Flip the statement...imagine a white male saying the same thing with the appropriate racial portions reversed.

which would imply you think something like this didn't happen. of course, a very small minority of white males basically gave themselves voting rights and kept a large portion of the population enslaved. This happened. you don't seem to grasp that.

furthermore....

The demographic makeup of the authors...yes...that has nothing to do with decisions made today. But you can keep being disingenuous if you so choose.

this isn't about sotomayor obviously, just you trying to appear like you know something, which I quickly pointed out you don't.

just because you're pretending to be condescending doesn't disguise the fact you're backpedaling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sotomayor said that the gender and ethnicity of judges do and SHOULD affect their judicial decision-making. "Our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging," she said. "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

All I did was take her statement and showed how it is as true for her as it was for the people that wrote the Constitution. You tried to tell us that for some reason, only the female Hispanic can have this kind of mindset.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

g5jamz if you want to know anything about the supreme court, how it was formed, how it reaches decisions, and how it is influenced by the past, you should pick up this book

37850444.JPG

it's written for an audience that can get through newsweek and nothing else so you should be able to handle it but if you have trouble then i would suggest this

51jSHSMBWyL._SS500_.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like everybody is arguing over whether or not it is right for a person to use their entire life experiences as a guide on how to perform their job duties and thus mold their decision making processes.

Sort of like what all human beings do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like everybody is arguing over whether or not it is right for a person to use their entire life experiences as a guide on how to perform their job duties and thus mold their decision making processes.

Sort of like what all human beings do.

no what detractors are really afraid of is that a non white in power might use that position to make things better for people like her (minorities) instead of knowing her place like other non whites on the bench (thomas) and keeping the status quo.

they fear this because conservative politicians have been using code language to signal incoming racist as poo policies forever, back when nixon won the south by alluding to jim crow laws by describing himself as a fan of conservative southern values *wink wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Of course, he's so massive he has his own gravitational pull. 
    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,243
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    GSO Goat
    Joined