When the ball is in the air he can drape a hell of a blanket over receivers. However I've seen him get burn't, give up a 10 yard padding allowing no inviting the quick slant. He is also getting older and we are paying him a pretty penny. Great player. Wrong situation.
I think you need to trade me some of that poo you're smoking
Jairus Byrd FS
Posted 05 November 2012 - 10:21 AM
Posted 05 November 2012 - 10:23 AM
Why? I would rather have Godfrey then a rookie SS when we have other needs to fill
Because Godfrey isnt good. He's a liability in coverage. and hes eating up too much $ for his lack of production
Posted 05 November 2012 - 10:25 AM
a couple restructures and a few extensions and we should be fine. Besides the only player that would save us money if we cut him would be Gamble and even then I don't think it saves us all that much.
It's not the roster spot I'm talking about. A FA like Byrd will cost $4-6 mill a year. Someone making actual money will have to be cut since we are over the 2013 cap. Gamble? DWill?
Posted 05 November 2012 - 10:31 AM
Posted 05 November 2012 - 10:38 AM
Posted 05 November 2012 - 10:42 AM
LaRon > Byrdman
Hardly... LaRon may be a better tackler, but byrd is way better in coverage. And that's the most important part of being a FS.
Posted 05 November 2012 - 11:56 AM
Byrd is a good player. Would be a big upgrade for our struggling Safety position.
Need to draft a bad ass SS to go along with him
Robert Lester could be that guy in the late second or early third round
Posted 05 November 2012 - 12:34 PM
Posted 05 November 2012 - 12:41 PM
secondary would go from a weakness to a strength, especially coupled with gamble's return, norman's play and captain's improvement. huge props to the front office (whoever they may be) if they make this happen.
Posted 05 November 2012 - 12:46 PM
Wait...what's that? Yep, I just got a chubby thinking about it.
Posted 05 November 2012 - 12:59 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users