Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

For the Ron Paul fans


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
21 replies to this topic

#1 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,011
  • Reputation: 2,376
HUDDLER

Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:36 PM

http://www.washingto...ws-us-far-gone/

Rep. Ron Paul, whose maverick presidential bids shook the GOP, said in the wake of this week's elections that the country has already veered over the fiscal cliff and he sees no chance of righting ship in a country where too many people are dependent on government.

"We're so far gone. We're over the cliff," the Texas Republican told Bloomberg Television's "In the Loop" program. "We cannot get enough people in Congress in the next 5-10 years who will do wise things." The video can be seen at http://www.bloomberg...XZL9Tvxkw.html.

Mr. Paul, who is retiring after 12 terms in the House, said voters on Tuesday rejected Mitt Romney because he had opposed the government bailout of General Motors and Chrysler.

"The people in the Midwest voted against him: 'Oh, we have to be taken care of!' So that vote was sort of like what we are laughing at in Greece," Mr. Paul said.

"People do not want anything cut," he said. "They want all the bailouts to come. They want the Fed to keep printing the money. And they don't believe that we've gone off the cliff or are close to going off the cliff. They think we can patch it over, that we can somehow come up with some magic solution. But you can't have a budgetary solution if you don't change what the role of government should be. As long as you think we have to police the world and run this welfare state, all we are going to argue about is who will get the loot."

Read more: Ron Paul: Election shows U.S. 'far gone' - Washington Times http://www.washingto.../#ixzz2BexIjXRK
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter


#2 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,011
  • Reputation: 2,376
HUDDLER

Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:53 PM

And by the way, how can the college kids go so hard for Ron Paul when he teaches and preaches responsibility?

#3 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,271
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:57 PM

And by the way, how can the college kids go so hard for Ron Paul when he teaches and preaches responsibility?


Because he's prolife.

He can have all the greatest ideas in the world to solve the issues that really cover what government is supposed to be about and provide, but if you're against a woman having the ability to wholesale slaughter a fetus...lol...well...forget that and pay for my Trojans or BC pills too. Hrmpff...

#4 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,027
  • Reputation: 442
HUDDLER

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:02 PM

"wholesale slaughter a fetus...lol"

#5 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,271
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:05 PM

"wholesale slaughter a fetus...lol"


Well...name another federal representative that's supported infanticide.

#6 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,027
  • Reputation: 442
HUDDLER

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:08 PM

Well...name another federal representative that's supported infanticide.


WHOLSALE SLAUGHTER OF FETUSES, INFANTICIDE, SUNDAY, SUNDAY!

#7 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,271
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:09 PM

WHOLSALE SLAUGHTER OF FETUSES, INFANTICIDE, SUNDAY, SUNDAY!


You have focus issues.

Squirrel!

#8 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,027
  • Reputation: 442
HUDDLER

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:11 PM

You have focus issues.

Squirrel!



i'm focused on making fun of you.

#9 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,271
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:17 PM

You make yourself look small by focusing on buzzwords and not the gist of the statement. Ron Paul will never get anywhere because liberals believe he wants his hands in vaginas.

#10 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,027
  • Reputation: 442
HUDDLER

Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:24 PM

You make yourself look small by focusing on buzzwords and not the gist of the statement. Ron Paul will never get anywhere because liberals believe he wants his hands in vaginas.



hahahahah. why would anyone believe such a thing?


WHOLESALE SLAUGHTER OF FETUSES!!!!

#11 Gazi

Gazi

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 07-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,008
  • Reputation: 382
HUDDLER

Posted 08 November 2012 - 05:47 PM

Jesus, g5

#12 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 17,684
  • Reputation: 5,613
Moderators

Posted 08 November 2012 - 07:16 PM

Because he's prolife.

He can have all the greatest ideas in the world to solve the issues that really cover what government is supposed to be about and provide, but if you're against a woman having the ability to wholesale slaughter a fetus...lol...well...forget that and pay for my Trojans or BC pills too. Hrmpff...

I agree that abortion is a contentious issue that may hold back some college age voters from voting for a guy like Paul, but if he had been given the GOP nomination, I have no doubt he would've had a much better chance of winning but lobbyists and the current system will never back a guy that would change the way things are.

Even if some college age voters are pro-choice, he would still win some of them over. I was talking with someone the other day and told them that abortion has gotten to the point that it's irrelevant when it comes to voting. There's no way anyone will ever repeal Roe v Wade at this point. Abortion is just too controversial, so even if a Repub ran with overturning that on his platform, it wouldn't happen. And for that reason, I think he would still get a lot of college votes had he been the nominee.

He is and was much more appealing and engaging to a wider audience than Romney could've ever dreamed to be.