Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Historical Presidential Elections in Maps


  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

#1 beach

beach

    |~~~~|

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,215 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:26 AM

Thought this was pretty cool:

http://www.270towin....tial-elections/

#2 FurdTurgason

FurdTurgason

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 954 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:38 AM

That's amazing. In 1976 Texas and the rest of the South was blue and California and Illinois were red. California didn't turn blue until 1992.

#3 Tarheel31

Tarheel31

    cynical pessimist

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 645 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:46 AM

That is an awesome site, pie for sharing.

I noticed that George Clinton was in the running in 1792, I had no idea he was so old!!!

Posted Image

#4 YourMomsLover

YourMomsLover

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,871 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 10:54 AM

Lol @ 1936 and 1984...

#5 beach

beach

    |~~~~|

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,215 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 11:00 AM

Lol @ 1936 and 1984...


Yeah 1936 def stood out haha

#6 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,091 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 11:14 AM

Reagan beat the snot out of everyone.

#7 Squirrel

Squirrel

    Drink a beer and relax

  • ALL-PRO
  • 12,523 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 11:17 AM

Republicans and Democrats did a flipflop in the 50's.

#8 theyhateme45

theyhateme45

    360 GT = Shino45

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,371 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 11:17 AM

It's good to see that not long ago candidates and issues mattered. Not it seems about 75% of states have already decided how they will vote in each election including 2016.

#9 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,091 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 11:30 AM

It's good to see that not long ago candidates and issues mattered. Not it seems about 75% of states have already decided how they will vote in each election including 2016.



A few hundred thousand folks, in some specific areas make the call.

It sucks.

#10 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,000 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 11:33 AM

^ this. time to lose the electoral college.

#11 theyhateme45

theyhateme45

    360 GT = Shino45

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,371 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 12:02 PM

^ this. time to lose the electoral college.


Or a electoral college reform... Maybe X vote % in a state gets certain amount of the electoral votes for that state... or award the electoral votes by US representative districts then give the other 2 electoral votes to the winner of the states popular vote.

#12 beach

beach

    |~~~~|

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,215 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 12:05 PM

Looking at 1912 reminded me how much of a boss Teddy was. Told both parties to f off and ran winning that many states.

I still think something like that could happen in the pacific northwest + Cali. with the right type of big player

#13 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,616 posts
  • LocationShallotte, NC

Posted 09 November 2012 - 12:07 PM

Republicans and Democrats did a flipflop in the 50's.


This is when the political right began it's retarded marriage with the religious right.

#14 I Mean He Was Found Guilty

I Mean He Was Found Guilty

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,798 posts
  • LocationChapel Hill

Posted 09 November 2012 - 12:10 PM

1972:



#15 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,091 posts

Posted 09 November 2012 - 12:45 PM

Or a electoral college reform... Maybe X vote % in a state gets certain amount of the electoral votes for that state... or award the electoral votes by US representative districts then give the other 2 electoral votes to the winner of the states popular vote.


I would be in favor of this. Too much control in certain areas of the map.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com