Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

The Two Most Embarrassing Plays of The Day = The Reason Chud Should've Already Been Canned.


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#11 TruCatzFan

TruCatzFan

    Phil 4:13

  • Joined: 21-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,470
  • Reputation: 592
  • LocationAlaska
HUDDLER

Posted 11 November 2012 - 05:25 PM

Should have kept running the RB screens til they backed the FUG up!!!

#12 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 17,064
  • Reputation: 5,234
Moderators

Posted 11 November 2012 - 05:29 PM

Should have kept running the RB screens til they backed the FUG up!!!

But that is another problem IMO. Yes, the screens worked but it was because Denver just didn't care if they gave them to us.

Chud just doesn't mix it up. We can't continually rely on a play that starts with a pass at the LOS or behind it to get us out of jams. He doesn't offer any variation... Why no slants? Drag routes? Spacing/hook routes? More passes coming out of a trips formation?

#13 njcarolina

njcarolina

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 25-October 09
  • posts: 86
  • Reputation: 18
ROOKIE

Posted 11 November 2012 - 05:41 PM

The thing I don't like about the read option is that the offensive line doesn't really know whether they're run-blocking or pass-protecting because the read is made during the play. It seems destined for failure.


It's a fumble or injury just waiting to happen every time

#14 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • posts: 7,321
  • Reputation: 1,840
SUPPORTER

Posted 11 November 2012 - 05:48 PM

Our only two successful drives had heavy doses of run, screens, passes to Olsen and other quick passes. When that was our gameplan we marched down the field. When he started calling these long developing plays they got blown up by the pass rush because the O-line can't sustain blocking for more than 1.5 seconds.

#15 Guest_Tom Cat_*

Guest_Tom Cat_*
Guests

Posted 11 November 2012 - 05:56 PM

Particularly sad that our head coach doesnt have a clue about effective offensive playcalling

#16 Tarheels23

Tarheels23

    Keep Pounding

  • Joined: 05-August 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,745
  • Reputation: 509
HUDDLER

Posted 11 November 2012 - 05:57 PM

Our only two successful drives had heavy doses of run, screens, passes to Olsen and other quick passes. When that was our gameplan we marched down the field. When he started calling these long developing plays they got blown up by the pass rush because the O-line can't sustain blocking for more than 1.5 seconds.



This sums it all up right here, too bad others choose not to see it.

#17 Miaoww

Miaoww

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,730
  • Reputation: 17
HUDDLER

Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:03 PM

The thing I don't like about the read option is that the offensive line doesn't really know whether they're run-blocking or pass-protecting because the read is made during the play. It seems destined for failure.


In the play that PD is talking about, running isn't an option.

It's a play action pass but as a read option play (in the shotgun formation). The O-line knows that it's a pass, but they're blocking like it's a run (to sell the fake).


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users