Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

NASA EMPLOYEE SPEAKS ABOUT NIBIRU ? ? ?


  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

#1 KaseKlosed

KaseKlosed

    @CMackMost

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,180
  • Reputation: 263
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 10:59 AM



#2 CatofWar

CatofWar

    Join, or Die

  • Joined: 24-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,487
  • Reputation: 865
  • LocationGitmo
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:47 AM

CNN confirmed its existence the other day, saying there's a probability of it hitting earth.

#3 catfang

catfang

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,791
  • Reputation: 1,464
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:55 AM

http://en.wikipedia....ibiru_cataclysm

Astronomers reject the idea of Nibiru, and have made efforts to inform the public that there is no threat to Earth in 2012.[19] They point out that such an object so close to Earth would be easily visible to the naked eye, as Jupiter and Saturn are both visible to the naked eye, and are dimmer than Nibiru would be at their distances. A planet such as Nibiru would create noticeable effects in the orbits of the outer planets.[20] Some counter this by claiming that the object has been concealed behind the Sun for several years, though this would be geometrically impossible.[12]Amateur photographs supposedly showing Nibiru near the Sun are usually the result of lens flares, false images of the Sun created by reflections within the lens.[21]
Astronomer Mike Brown notes that if this object's orbit were as described, it would only have lasted in the Solar System for a million years or so before Jupiter expelled it, and that there is no way another object's magnetic field could have such an effect on Earth.[22] Lieder's assertions that the approach of Nibiru would cause the Earth's rotation to stop or its axis to shift violate the laws of physics. In his rebuttal of Immanuel Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision, which made the same claim that the Earth's rotation could be stopped and then restarted, Carl Sagan noted that, "the energy required to brake the Earth is not enough to melt it, although it would result in a noticeable increase in temperature: The oceans would [be] raised to the boiling point of water ... [Also,] how does the Earth get started up again, rotating at approximately the same rate of spin? The Earth cannot do it by itself, because of the law of the conservation of angular momentum."[23]
In a 2009 interview with the Discovery Channel, Mike Brown noted that, while it is not impossible that the Sun has a distant planetary companion, such an object would have to be lying very far from the observed regions of the Solar System to have no gravitational effect on the other planets. A Mars-sized object could lie undetected at 300 AU (10 times the distance of Neptune); a Jupiter-sized object at 30,000 AU. To travel 1000 AU in two years, an object would need to be moving at 2400 km/s – faster than the galactic escape velocity. At that speed, any object would be shot out of the Solar System, and then out of the Milky Way galaxy into intergalactic space

#4 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,012
  • Reputation: 440
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:59 AM

CNN confirmed its existence the other day, saying there's a probability of it hitting earth.


wat?

#5 KaseKlosed

KaseKlosed

    @CMackMost

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,180
  • Reputation: 263
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 12:52 PM

http://en.wikipedia....ibiru_cataclysm

Astronomers reject the idea of Nibiru, and have made efforts to inform the public that there is no threat to Earth in 2012.[19] They point out that such an object so close to Earth would be easily visible to the naked eye, as Jupiter and Saturn are both visible to the naked eye, and are dimmer than Nibiru would be at their distances. A planet such as Nibiru would create noticeable effects in the orbits of the outer planets.[20] Some counter this by claiming that the object has been concealed behind the Sun for several years, though this would be geometrically impossible.[12]Amateur photographs supposedly showing Nibiru near the Sun are usually the result of lens flares, false images of the Sun created by reflections within the lens.[21]
Astronomer Mike Brown notes that if this object's orbit were as described, it would only have lasted in the Solar System for a million years or so before Jupiter expelled it, and that there is no way another object's magnetic field could have such an effect on Earth.[22] Lieder's assertions that the approach of Nibiru would cause the Earth's rotation to stop or its axis to shift violate the laws of physics. In his rebuttal of Immanuel Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision, which made the same claim that the Earth's rotation could be stopped and then restarted, Carl Sagan noted that, "the energy required to brake the Earth is not enough to melt it, although it would result in a noticeable increase in temperature: The oceans would [be] raised to the boiling point of water ... [Also,] how does the Earth get started up again, rotating at approximately the same rate of spin? The Earth cannot do it by itself, because of the law of the conservation of angular momentum."[23]
In a 2009 interview with the Discovery Channel, Mike Brown noted that, while it is not impossible that the Sun has a distant planetary companion, such an object would have to be lying very far from the observed regions of the Solar System to have no gravitational effect on the other planets. A Mars-sized object could lie undetected at 300 AU (10 times the distance of Neptune); a Jupiter-sized object at 30,000 AU. To travel 1000 AU in two years, an object would need to be moving at 2400 km/s – faster than the galactic escape velocity. At that speed, any object would be shot out of the Solar System, and then out of the Milky Way galaxy into intergalactic space





#6 ARSEN

ARSEN

    Banned

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • posts: 13,604
  • Reputation: 4,282
SUPPORTER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 01:45 PM

Red Dwarf aka Nabiri will be impossible to see because it does not reflect any light. Its a cold, dead planet and the only way we can see is by feeling the destruction from gravitational pull. Aka... We can only discover it when poo hits the fan. I believe Nabiru exists and it passes through our solar system every 26,000 or so years. If you read greek and sumarian mythology then u know both cultures talked about 12 planets in our solar system but we only see 11 (including pluto) and 1 is still missing. What happened to the 12th planet? Also, number of asteroid flying toward earth increased almost 10 fold in last few years... Why? What takes these asteroids from outer space and shoots them toward earth at incredible speed?

#7 CatofWar

CatofWar

    Join, or Die

  • Joined: 24-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,487
  • Reputation: 865
  • LocationGitmo
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 01:57 PM

wat?


See kk's post.

#8 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,012
  • Reputation: 440
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 02:01 PM

Red Dwarf aka Nabiri will be impossible to see because it does not reflect any light. Its a cold, dead planet and the only way we can see is by feeling the destruction from gravitational pull. Aka... We can only discover it when poo hits the fan. I believe Nabiru exists and it passes through our solar system every 26,000 or so years. If you read greek and sumarian mythology then u know both cultures talked about 12 planets in our solar system but we only see 11 (including pluto) and 1 is still missing. What happened to the 12th planet? Also, number of asteroid flying toward earth increased almost 10 fold in last few years... Why? What takes these asteroids from outer space and shoots them toward earth at incredible speed?


can you explain how a physical body wouldn't reflect light? cold and dead still reflects light.

#9 mmmbeans

mmmbeans

    FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,012
  • Reputation: 440
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 02:01 PM

See kk's post.


i see i see.

#10 FuzzyPanther

FuzzyPanther

    ...feeling sexy as usual

  • Joined: 02-April 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 434
  • Reputation: 33
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 02:06 PM

Did I accidentally click on tinderbox again?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users