Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Cam posted a qbr yesterday of


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#16 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,262 posts

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:26 PM

i just looked up tebows game log on espn.com and the game in which he had those stats you just listed his qbr was 39.4. Good job making stuff up.

Wow sweetie calm down. Here is a link.

http://espn.go.com/n...tal-qbr-leaders

#17 panthers04100

panthers04100

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,106 posts

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:30 PM

Wow sweetie calm down. Here is a link.

http://espn.go.com/n...tal-qbr-leaders

his game long says 39.4 which I think is more accurate. They must of made a mistake with that article. I dunno.

#18 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,262 posts

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:33 PM

I think the QBR in that game log leaves out rushing stats.

#19 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,735 posts
  • LocationShallotte, NC

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:34 PM

his game long says 39.4 which I think is more accurate. They must of made a mistake with that article. I dunno.


They changed their statistic formula, after the fact. It's a constantly fluid algorithm, hence the worthless value as a statistic.

If you actually payed attention to football and statistics you would remember the stink this arose last year - the first year they unveiled the statistic.

#20 Mother Grabber

Mother Grabber

    Gettlemagic 2.0

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,897 posts

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:39 PM

They changed their statistic formula, after the fact. It's a constantly fluid algorithm, hence the worthless value as a statistic.

If you actually payed attention to football and statistics you would remember the stink this arose last year - the first year they unveiled the statistic.



WTF. That's hilarious. How the fug are you supposed to use any statistic, where the criteria for measuring the statistic is constantly in flux. That's just dildos.

#21 panthers04100

panthers04100

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,106 posts

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:41 PM

They changed their statistic formula, after the fact. It's a constantly fluid algorithm, hence the worthless value as a statistic.

If you actually payed attention to football and statistics you would remember the stink this arose last year - the first year they unveiled the statistic.

oh well I guess it's better now then. A 2.0 is just sad.

#22 Dpantherman

Dpantherman

    certified pee-on

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,475 posts

Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:30 AM

Qbr is actually a much better indicator of the quarterbacks play than quarterback rating

According to ESPN. They are the only folks that give a poo about QBR.

#23 Panthers128

Panthers128

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,283 posts

Posted 13 November 2012 - 01:58 AM

http://espn.go.com/nfl/qbr

Better than Mark Sanchez at least.

If you set it to show the unqualified players, DeAngelo Williams in the wildcat is a superior QB than Brady Quinn and Chad Henne.

Ouch.

#24 panthers04100

panthers04100

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,106 posts

Posted 13 November 2012 - 02:07 AM

http://espn.go.com/nfl/qbr

Better than Mark Sanchez at least.

If you set it to show the unqualified players, DeAngelo Williams in the wildcat is a superior QB than Brady Quinn and Chad Henne.

Ouch.

matt cassell and blaine gabbert with a higher qbr. Damn.

#25 Car123

Car123

    Newton's Law

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,066 posts

Posted 13 November 2012 - 03:31 AM

They changed their statistic formula, after the fact. It's a constantly fluid algorithm, hence the worthless value as a statistic.

If you actually payed attention to football and statistics you would remember the stink this arose last year - the first year they unveiled the statistic.

his game long says 39.4 which I think is more accurate. They must of made a mistake with that article. I dunno.

WTF. That's hilarious. How the fug are you supposed to use any statistic, where the criteria for measuring the statistic is constantly in flux. That's just dildos.

QBR is different from a qb rating

Perfect QBR score is 100 while a perfect qb rating in 158.3

#26 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

    The loud atheist minority drummed Tim Tevo out of the NFL.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,273 posts

Posted 13 November 2012 - 08:01 AM

At least he still has a good QB Rating

http://espn.go.com/n...arterbackRating


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com