Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Cam posted a qbr yesterday of


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#11 Cracka McNasty

Cracka McNasty

    WWNPHD?

  • Joined: 27-October 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,164
  • Reputation: 1,882
  • LocationCharlotte
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 10:24 PM

Just for some perspective, last year The Golden Calf of Bristol had a better QBR than Aaron Rodgers.



no he didn't...

timmy did one game, but not over the whole year

#12 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,814
  • Reputation: 4,784
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 10:25 PM

no he didn't...

timmy did one game, but not over the whole year

My posts get better with age so you should check it again

#13 teeray

teeray

    THE SWAGNIFICENT

  • Joined: 10-January 11
  • posts: 16,882
  • Reputation: 8,777
SUPPORTER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 10:40 PM

I admire what they are trying to do with total QBR but it is a flawed stat. But I think it is a good base to try and approve on and move away from just QB rating.

For instance, I believe Steve Smith had a drop on third down and long yesterday, that severely hurts your QBR.

Also, if you make a great read on the defense and get the ball to a guy who is open ten yards down field and then he takes off for a big gain, that is graded significantly lower than chucking a ball 40 yards down field into double coverage and the WR making the play simply because the ball traveled farther down the field.

Despite all that it still is skewed to west coast offenses and dink and dunk offenses which is one of the things it was trying to correct.

#14 panthers04100

panthers04100

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,107
  • Reputation: 302
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:02 PM

Just for some perspective, here are two games compared using QBR from PFT.

Aarron Rodgers
26 of 39
396 yards
2 TDs
QBR 82.1.

The Golden Calf of Bristol
4 of 10
79 yards
1 TD
1 Rushing TD
QBR 83.2.

link to each game please

#15 panthers04100

panthers04100

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,107
  • Reputation: 302
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:07 PM

Just for some perspective, here are two games compared using QBR from PFT.

Aarron Rodgers
26 of 39
396 yards
2 TDs
QBR 82.1.

The Golden Calf of Bristol
4 of 10
79 yards
1 TD
1 Rushing TD
QBR 83.2.

i just looked up tebows game log on espn.com and the game in which he had those stats you just listed his qbr was 39.4. Good job making stuff up.

#16 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,814
  • Reputation: 4,784
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:26 PM

i just looked up tebows game log on espn.com and the game in which he had those stats you just listed his qbr was 39.4. Good job making stuff up.

Wow sweetie calm down. Here is a link.

http://espn.go.com/n...tal-qbr-leaders

#17 panthers04100

panthers04100

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,107
  • Reputation: 302
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:30 PM

Wow sweetie calm down. Here is a link.

http://espn.go.com/n...tal-qbr-leaders

his game long says 39.4 which I think is more accurate. They must of made a mistake with that article. I dunno.

#18 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,814
  • Reputation: 4,784
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:33 PM

I think the QBR in that game log leaves out rushing stats.

#19 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,885
  • Reputation: 3,405
  • LocationShallotte, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:34 PM

his game long says 39.4 which I think is more accurate. They must of made a mistake with that article. I dunno.


They changed their statistic formula, after the fact. It's a constantly fluid algorithm, hence the worthless value as a statistic.

If you actually payed attention to football and statistics you would remember the stink this arose last year - the first year they unveiled the statistic.

#20 Mother Grabber

Mother Grabber

    Gettlemagic 2.0

  • Joined: 22-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,501
  • Reputation: 3,455
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2012 - 11:39 PM

They changed their statistic formula, after the fact. It's a constantly fluid algorithm, hence the worthless value as a statistic.

If you actually payed attention to football and statistics you would remember the stink this arose last year - the first year they unveiled the statistic.



WTF. That's hilarious. How the fug are you supposed to use any statistic, where the criteria for measuring the statistic is constantly in flux. That's just dildos.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users