They changed their statistic formula, after the fact. It's a constantly fluid algorithm, hence the worthless value as a statistic.
If you actually payed attention to football and statistics you would remember the stink this arose last year - the first year they unveiled the statistic.
his game long says 39.4 which I think is more accurate. They must of made a mistake with that article. I dunno.
QBR is different from a qb rating
WTF. That's hilarious. How the fug are you supposed to use any statistic, where the criteria for measuring the statistic is constantly in flux. That's just dildos.
Perfect QBR score is 100 while a perfect qb rating in 158.3