Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Bronn

Citizens of multiple states create online petitions to secede from the US.

254 posts in this topic

It's called personal responsibility.

If the people didn't think that the government was there to bail them out, do you think that folks would be a little more prepared?

You are in the housing industry, no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

allow me to go ahead and play this one out for you. housing industry bailed out. hypocrite!

only government decided to change the market to push bad lending practices, and then blamed those institutions after being compelled to lend said bad investments.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was greed that led to it. Greed on the lenders and the lendees.

They got bailed out. They gave incentives to buy homes.

But those welfare queens and their cellphones...

Lets secede!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was greed that led to it. Greed on the lenders and the lendees.

They got bailed out. They gave incentives to buy homes.

But those welfare queens and their cellphones...

Lets secede!

you are correct that it was greed that led to it. however, it was greed on capital hill for voting blocks rather than what you assert. were it merely greed done through lending practices, the market would have killed those institutions in short order. however, since the notion of "too big to fail" arose, bad lending practices continue today... we just think we can inflate the bubble indefinitely.

the discipline of failure will be on a national scale instead of an individual business scale. the failures of the few will bring us all down

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you are correct that it was greed that led to it. however, it was greed on capital hill for voting blocks rather than what you assert. were it merely greed done through lending practices, the market would have killed those institutions in short order

If by "the market would have killed those institutions in short order" you mean, "those institutions would have just bundled the bad loans into derivatives which could be sold off easily thanks to the AAA credit ratings given to them by the market" then yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was greed that led to it. Greed on the lenders and the lendees.

They got bailed out. They gave incentives to buy homes.

But those welfare queens and their cellphones...

Lets secede!

It's both man. Why do you guys struggle to see this?

Without Freddie and Fannie, none of this could have happened. Meaning, without the federal government being involved in banking and housing, this would not have happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are in the housing industry, no?

Yup, and I would have preferred to not have any boom, and not have the bust that followed.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If by "the market would have killed those institutions in short order" you mean, "those institutions would have just bundled the bad loans into derivatives which could be sold off easily thanks to the AAA credit ratings given to them by the market" then yes

okay... let's put it like this. did the creation of fannie and freddie predate said bad lending practices? no? where are those banking institutions now? THAT'S RIGHT! they don't EXIST anymore! after fannie and freddie? well we'll just use the public coffers, fiat currency, and future IOUs to cover that little snafu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you take a lot for granted, and thinking you know what really is going on in people's minds is quite arrogant.

Wow, Rodeo arrogant, news at 11.

Meanwhile I'm still yet to hear an actual reason besides vague bullshit like "freedom" so the point still stands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, Rodeo arrogant, news at 11.

Meanwhile I'm still yet to hear an actual reason besides vague bullshit like "freedom" so the point still stands.

if freedom is bullshit to you, then perhaps you aren't paying attention

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is the off-season and winning online competitions is kinda our thing.   Let's see if we can't swing this thing.  The Pats need to go home.  We must fight the Evil League of Evil coalition. 
    •   So are you upset that Hillary lost and we stopped investigating her?  Or that in an alternate reality, Hillary won and no one is talking about Russia?  I'm trying to see your point, but alas, you might be too clever for me. Or are we back to it's not fair to expect Trump NOT to have Russian ties because of business interests?  Again, all Trump had to do was completely break from his companies, and he did not.  And we're seeing some serious Russian interests in Trump winning, and a lot of contact between Trump's campaign officials and advisers, which is good or bad? I'm not sure the point you're trying to make.  Is it "yay, Trump won so we can investigate Russian interference with the election and administration!"  Or is it "Boo, if Hillary won she wouldn't be investigated!" Hillary lost.  People came out for Trump in the rust belt. Now that people are looking at Trump, what he's said, what laws he's trying to pass, etc; a lot of information is coming out.  Is that bad?  Or is it just that the media is being unfair to Trump? Maybe I'm just not smart enough to get it.
    • I highly doubt this will upset anyone, unless they are trolling that is.