Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Ron Paul probably gave his last speech in Congress


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#16 teeray

teeray

    THE SWAGNIFICENT

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,663 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 11:01 PM

Love him or hate him. Nobody is more genuine and not afraid to look bad or crazy. I'm sure the framers of the US got the same look when they brought up idea of America while in England.



http://news.yahoo.co...s-politics.html

Pretty sure the framers of the United States weren't in England. Most of them were born and lived the majority of their entire lives in America.

The only one that I can recall that even lived in England was Benjamin Franklin.

#17 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,411 posts
  • LocationMontford

Posted 14 November 2012 - 11:07 PM

correct. i should say the idea of what America was to become, by those that wanted it WHILE in England, certainly got bizzare looks. But the actual framers themselves were born in the states.
The spirit of the comment was the ballsiness of the overall idea of a USA.
Framers born in the states. Fact. Those that came up with the overall idea, not born in the US. Fact.

#18 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Moderators
  • 15,187 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 12:01 AM

Can someone direct me to evidence that Ron Paul is racist? I've never heard, seen, or read anything to support that.

#19 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,633 posts
  • LocationShallotte, NC

Posted 15 November 2012 - 12:05 AM

Can someone direct me to evidence that Ron Paul is racist? I've never heard, seen, or read anything to support that.


There were some newsletters with his name attached to them. They were written by another party, or ghost writer as it were, but distributed under Pauls name and "approval". Paul has always accepted responsibility for allowing them to be distributed without proper oversight but he denies writing them and even presents arguments that the ideology contained within actually goes against his long standing positions.

#20 Bronn

Bronn

    Sellsword

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,773 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 08:29 AM

I really wish RP folk would just move on and support folks like Gary Johnson... I, too, acknowledge that Paul has done as much as he can to stick it to the two party system and hold the government responsible for its actions. However, his quetionable past and the R beside his name will always be the talking point for those who want to detract from what he's saying now.

The people who support RP that aren't the tea partying, white supremacist, lost souls need to latch on to people like Johnson and Alan Grayson, and push harder for an independent third party voice in American politics.

The ones that are the tea partying, white supremacist, lost souls need to just return to the Republican party from whence they came...

#21 CatofWar

CatofWar

    Join, or Die

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,441 posts
  • LocationGitmo

Posted 15 November 2012 - 08:17 PM

Posted Image

#22 GOOGLE RON PAUL

GOOGLE RON PAUL

    fleet-footed poster

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,140 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:48 AM

There were some newsletters with his name attached to them. They were written by another party, or ghost writer as it were, but distributed under Pauls name and "approval". Paul has always accepted responsibility for allowing them to be distributed without proper oversight but he denies writing them and even presents arguments that the ideology contained within actually goes against his long standing positions.



Dr. Paul denied suggestions that he was a racist and said he was not evoking stereotypes when he wrote the columns. He said they should be read and quoted in their entirety to avoid misrepresentation…
In the interview, he did not deny he made the statement about the swiftness of black men.
“If you try to catch someone that has stolen a purse from you, there is no chance to catch them,” Dr. Paul said.



– In 1996, Ron Paul’s campaign defended his statements about the rationality of fearing black men. (“[W]e are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational.”) The Houston Chronicle reports, “A campaign spokesman for Paul said statements about the fear of black males mirror pronouncements by black leaders such as the Rev. Jesse Jackson.” [Houston Chronicle, 5/23/96]
– Paul said that his comments on blacks contained in the newsletters should be viewed in the context of “current events and statistical reports of the time.” [Houston Chronicle, 5/23/96]
– Paul defended statements from an August 12, 1992 newsletter calling the late Rep. Barbara Jordan (D-TX) a “moron” and a “fraud.” Paul also said Jordon was “her race and sex protect her from criticism.” In response, Paul said “such opinions represented our clear philosophical difference.” [Roll Call, 7/29/96]
– “Also in 1992, Paul wrote, ‘Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5 percent of blacks have sensible political opinions.’ Sullivan said Paul does not consider people who disagree with him to be sensible. And most blacks, [Paul spokesman Michael] Sullivan said, do not share Paul’s views.” [Austin American Statesman, 5/23/96]


Contrary to his statements to CNN last week, it was not until 2001, that he first claimed that newsletters were not written by him. He told the Texas Monthly in the October 2001 edition that “I could never say this in the campaign, but those words weren’t really written by me.” The reporter noted, “until this surprising volte-face in our interview, he had never shared this secret.”
There is no evidence that Paul denounced the newsletters in clear terms until he ran for president in 2008 when he said “I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts.” Paul has never explained how this blanket denial squares with his vigorous defense of the writings in 1996.
Further, some of the disturbing ideology embedded in the newsletters is reflected in Paul’s legislative record. In 1999, he was the only member of Congress to oppose the issuing on a Congressional Gold Medal to Rosa Parks. In May 2011, Ron Paul said in an interview that he opposes the Civil Rights Act of 1964.


ron paul is a racist and the worst thing about his farewell address is that, as gazi said, it's about 40 years too late.

fug off RONPAUL

#23 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • ALL-PRO
  • 23,139 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 07:06 PM

Ron Paul appeals to the beef farmers in rural Texas as well he should.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com