Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Some more Chuck love


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

#16 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Moderators
  • -29,816 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 10:42 AM

I understand that and they're doing awesome, but I still wana see consistency out of hardy that's all, and a Alexander is awesome, but just getting one more 1st and second rounder to play to their potential would put us over the top is all I'm saying

the Dline is more than good enough.

i would rather us get a 1st round talent at FS or WR.

#17 Nicks To The Colts

Nicks To The Colts

    shitpost around the clock

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,492 posts
  • LocationChapel Hill

Posted 15 November 2012 - 10:42 AM

ho ho holy poo am i happy that he's not a dirty bird

charles johnson opposite abraham. gives me piss shivers.

#18 bigdog10

bigdog10

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,265 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 10:58 AM

Just to think if we had a secondary that we trusted enough to play some tight man behind him him...


fixed it for you

#19 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,916 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 11:09 AM

having a hard time getting used to this "chuck" name.



I find it refreshing in comparison to all the DWill, JStew, RGIII, MJD, A-Rod, PP7...type crap

#20 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Moderators
  • -29,816 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 11:11 AM

I find it refreshing in comparison to all the DWill, JStew, RGIII, MJD, A-Rod, PP7...type crap

still it's just odd.

he doesn't look like a chuck to me. i keep on trying to figure out what coach or former player they are talking about.

crap, i actually think of gruden first because he looks like a chuck.

#21 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,916 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 11:17 AM

still it's just odd.

he doesn't look like a chuck to me. i keep on trying to figure out what coach or former player they are talking about.

crap, i actually think of gruden first because he looks like a chuck.



I personally don't like using nicknames. For some reason I prefer using the name given to them by their mothers and fathers or their last name.

#22 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Moderators
  • -29,816 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 11:20 AM

I personally don't like using nicknames. For some reason I prefer using the name given to them by their mothers and fathers or their last name.

i never called chad johnson anything other than chad johnson.

#23 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,916 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 11:23 AM

i never called chad johnson anything other than chad johnson.



I've never made a reference to CJ, the Kraken, and the Edwards "Wall" as members of the Feline D-Line until now.

Please shoot me.

#24 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Moderators
  • -29,816 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 12:26 PM

I've never made a reference to CJ, the Kraken, and the Edwards "Wall" as members of the Feline D-Line until now.

Please shoot me.

i'm guilty of those. the krakan just seems fitting and is a whole lot more creative than the initial+number stuff and it's not one he gave himself.

CJ just because i'm lazy.

just don't know why it's necessary for everyone to have some cool nickname.

signed,
rayzor






ugh.

#25 Gabeking

Gabeking

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,306 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 12:32 PM

the Dline is more than good enough.

i would rather us get a 1st round talent at FS or WR.


Yeah I'd want a FS(or Oline) in the first too, all I was saying was if we somehow got an extra first or second this offseason or during the draft it should be used on a a pass rusher because it would put our pass rush over the top is all I'm saying

#26 Gabeking

Gabeking

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,306 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 12:33 PM

fixed it for you


Good enough lol

#27 skarbar001

skarbar001

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 156 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 01:00 PM

Ray Edwards was a simple example of supply and demand...Falcons needed a pass rusher. Charles Johnson was by far the best one on the market. Panthers overpaid to keep him, and he turned out to be a consistent player.

Ray Edwards benefited from playing on one of the best D-Line's in the game at the time. Because of Charles Johnson's deal, Ray Edwards commanded a much higher salary that he wasn't really worth...just because there weren't many other alternatives on the market. Even though it was a small win, I'll take any Panthers victory over the Falcons right now. Keeping CJ away from the Falcons was the right move at any cost.



I just don't quite understood this right here. We paid not only an ascending, young player but also, out priced ATL. But how is he overpaid?

Julius Peppers: 6 years 84 mil.
Mario Williams: 6 years 96 mil.
Charles Johnson: 6 years 76 mil.
Cameron Wake: 5 years 34 mil. (he was paid for being an outside LB at the time)
Elvis Dumervil: 6 years 61.5 mil. (he was paid for being an outside LB at the time)

So we got a statistically better player than those DEs who were paid as DEs, and at a cheaper price.

#28 hepcat

hepcat

    Skandalouz

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,305 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 01:12 PM

I just don't quite understood this right here. We paid not only an ascending, young player but also, out priced ATL. But how is he overpaid?

Julius Peppers: 6 years 84 mil.
Mario Williams: 6 years 96 mil.
Charles Johnson: 6 years 76 mil.
Cameron Wake: 5 years 34 mil. (he was paid for being an outside LB at the time)
Elvis Dumervil: 6 years 61.5 mil. (he was paid for being an outside LB at the time)

So we got a statistically better player than those DEs who were paid as DEs, and at a cheaper price.


Charles Johnson is one of the highest paid players not only in the NFL, but in the WORLD.

http://www.theriches...-paid-athletes/

He's a good player, but he's not THAT good.

#29 fieryprophet

fieryprophet

    WARNING: Do not annoy!

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,145 posts
  • LocationLa Grange, NC

Posted 15 November 2012 - 01:15 PM

Charles Johnson is one of the highest paid players not only in the NFL, but in the WORLD.

http://www.theriches...-paid-athletes/

That's because his contract was front-loaded, he'll fall off that list this year.

He's a good player, but he's not THAT good.



#30 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,508 posts
  • LocationAt the lake

Posted 15 November 2012 - 02:25 PM

Anyone think that the reason that our D line is so good this year might be because of McDermott's scheme. Funny how this year they are suddenly beasting and we even have an undertackle with 5 or more sacks which hasn't happened in forever. Maybe all those things about McDermott were wrong and as I said, once we got good linebackers and could run our aggressive scheme, this D line would be pretty good.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.