Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

NH House votes down gay marriage bill because of religious liberty protection clause


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
56 replies to this topic

#37 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,267
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 28 May 2009 - 12:54 PM

You mean like....black colleges?


Whites can go to black colleges...but don't expect entrance standards subsidies.

#38 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,166
  • Reputation: 5,258
HUDDLER

Posted 28 May 2009 - 01:00 PM

You mean like....black colleges?


exactly like them, because they have to admit everyone.

just like the wiccan club at my mom's work had to admit a bunch of frat boys who make fun of them :D

#39 Matt Foley

Matt Foley

    Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,983
  • Reputation: 1
HUDDLER

Posted 28 May 2009 - 01:00 PM

You think no whites go to black colleges?


Do these colleges sell themselves as a welcome environment for white people?

#40 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,861
  • Reputation: 2,553
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 May 2009 - 01:01 PM

not the point. The point is they have to obey the law, not obey the law with a smile and a fruit basket.

#41 Matt Foley

Matt Foley

    Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,983
  • Reputation: 1
HUDDLER

Posted 28 May 2009 - 01:05 PM

not the point. The point is they have to obey the law, not obey the law with a smile and a fruit basket.


Is that some kind of gay joke? You homophobic......homo.

#42 Epistaxis

Epistaxis

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,184
  • Reputation: 51
HUDDLER

Posted 28 May 2009 - 02:31 PM

i came into the thread not having a problem with it because yes, churches should be allowed to discriminate all they want. but zod raised a good point with taxes. an organization should not be allowed to be tax exempt and discriminate at the same time. that is in essence government sponsored discrimination.



ditto

can't have cake+eat it

#43 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 47,945
  • Reputation: 15,518
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 May 2009 - 05:24 PM

Requiring that a group hold certain beliefs in order to be recognized as a valid religion is equal to government infringement on freedom of religion.

It works both ways.

#44 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 18,125
  • Reputation: 1,527
HUDDLER

Posted 28 May 2009 - 05:39 PM

Just to clarify, you are ok with churches not marrying interracial couples?


Doesn't matter if he is ok with it. If you force them to do it, then the first amendment is being violated. And fwiw, the tax issue is irrelevant. Should a religion lose its tax exempt status just because it does something that society disagrees with? Mr. Scott is correct.

Edited by Davidson Deac II, 28 May 2009 - 05:42 PM.


#45 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,166
  • Reputation: 5,258
HUDDLER

Posted 28 May 2009 - 06:22 PM

tax exemption for religion is not in the constitution. that is a special privilege. it's not infringing on freedom of religion in the least. it is giving them all the freedom in the world to do what they want, and to pick between keeping discrimination or their special privileges. they're still 100% free to practice their religion as they see fit.

to answer your question, DDII, yes, they should lose it. why shouldn't they?

#46 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,166
  • Reputation: 5,258
HUDDLER

Posted 28 May 2009 - 06:25 PM

do you guys like the idea of your tax money subsidizing the westborro baptist church's military funeral protests? because by not paying taxes, that's exactly what's happening. you're pulling their weight.

#47 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,973
  • Reputation: 9,072
HUDDLER

Posted 28 May 2009 - 06:41 PM

tax exemption for religion is not in the constitution. that is a special privilege. it's not infringing on freedom of religion in the least. it is giving them all the freedom in the world to do what they want, and to pick between keeping discrimination or their special privileges. they're still 100% free to practice their religion as they see fit.

to answer your question, DDII, yes, they should lose it. why shouldn't they?


This is a question rodeo... I don't know the answer, which is why I'm asking... obviously it is not in the constitution that churches are tax exempt... why are they, when did that happen?

#48 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,166
  • Reputation: 5,258
HUDDLER

Posted 28 May 2009 - 06:50 PM

i don't know either. i know it's 501c3. i can't find any info about its origins though.